ADL, Ron Paul, Stormfront

ADL Extremism vs. Stormfront Extremism

by Joachim Martillo (ThorsProvoni@aol.com)

 

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) reported on Nov. 15, 2007 (http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/105349.html, see below) that "[the] Anti-Defamation League plans to ask Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul to distance himself from extremist groups" because "[his]campaign reportedly has accepted a donation from Don Black, the owner of the white supremacist Web site Stormfront."

 

The JTA used the last paragraph of its report to recall the ADL commendation of Giuliani's rejection of a donation from Saudi Prince Al-Walid bin Talal in order to insinuate some sort of equivalence between receiving $10 million from a respected Saudi philanthropist and accepting a campaign contribution of undisclosed amount from the Stormfront owner.

 

Stormfront is a racist white nationalist organization while the ADL is a racist Jewish nationalist organization that has committed civil or criminal infractions against non-Jews and its Jewish critics since the 1930s. The ADL has a long history of participation in or orchestration of "Conspiracy against Rights" (a criminal violation under 18 USC 241) for the sake of ethnic Ashkenazi tribalism or in support of the State of Israel.

 

The ADL is the official voice of sophisticated Jewish denial of the Zionist genocide against Palestinians and of the Ottoman genocide against Armenians. 

 

Here is article 2 from the international Convention on Genocide (http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html)

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Items a, b, and c have applied to Palestine since racist Eastern European Ashkenazim began to invade Palestine for the purpose of stealing it from the native population at the end of the 19th century. Genocidal Zionist intent against the native population of Palestine can be traced back as far as 1882 as the following citation from Professor Joel Kovel on page 45 of Overcoming Zionism demonstrates.

Thus Vladimir Dubnow, in 1882: "The ultimate goal is, in time, to take over the Land of Israel and to restore to the Jews the political independence they have been deprived of for these two thousand years ... The Jews will yet arise and, arms in hand (if need be), declare that they are the masters of their ancient homeland."

Despite the longstanding intent of Zionists to murder Arab Palestine and the physical destruction of Arab Palestine from 1947 until today, a January 26, 2007 ADL Press Release (Spanish Mayor's Decision to Commemorate 'Palestinian Genocide' On Holocaust Memorial Day 'Shameful') contains the following two paragraphs.

In a letter to Susana León Gordillo, the Mayor of Ciempozuelos, a city near Madrid, and a member of the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE), ADL leaders, Glen S. Lewy, National Chair and Abraham H. Foxman, National Director said, "Your attempt to equate the industrialized mass murder of six million Jewish women, men and children, as well as millions of others, with the situation of the Palestinian people is shameful. It reflects an extremely disturbing tendency, which is particularly visible in Europe, to dishonor the memory of the victims of the Holocaust and de-legitimize the State of Israel by seeking to eradicate the clear moral difference between the Holocaust and the loss of Palestinian lives as a result of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

"Applying the term 'genocide' to the Arab-Israeli conflict encourages hatred toward the State of Israel and deliberately insults those of us, both Jews and non-Jews, who seek to solemnly commemorate the victims of the Nazi campaign of slaughter."

Despite the above ADL assertions the Nakba or Holoexaleipsis (see Holoexaleipsis, Holocaust, Holosphage and Holodomor) is the archetypal genocide of the 20th century.

 

Central and Eastern European hatred and fear of Jews during the 1920s and 1930s is understandable because so many ethnic Ashkenazi Soviet officials were up to their eyeballs in mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide from the Russian Revolution through the 1930s in the Soviet Union (see The Pattern of Ethnic Ashkenazi Genocidalism: The Jewish Century by Yuri Slezkine).

 

In contrast German Jewish and ethnic Ashkenazi Zionists plotted the destruction of the native Palestinian population completely in cold blood, for European Jews had practically no contact whatsoever with Palestinians until the Zionist invasion of Palestine began in the late 19th century.

 

The Holoexaleipis should and must be remembered at any commemoration of the Holocaust because Jewish racists and extremists invariably use the Holocaust as a red herring to justify or to distract from Zionist crimes against Palestine. 

 

Zionist denial of the genocide of Armenians is even more sophisticated and calculated.

 

The ADL Statement on the Armenian Genocide includes the following paragraph.

We have never negated but have always described the painful events of 1915-1918 perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire against the Armenians as massacres and atrocities.  On reflection, we have come to share the view of Henry Morgenthau, Sr. that the consequences of those actions were indeed tantamount to genocide [my emphasis]. If the word genocide had existed then, they would have called it genocide.

The systematic slaughter of Armenians is not genocide but is only "tantamount to genocide," for the statement refers only to consequences and not to intent as the Convention on Genocide requires. 

 

The ADL justifies its shyster lawyer legalism by allusion to threats against Turkish Jewry and by the need for good Turkish-American Jewish relations in order to strengthen Turkish-Israeli military cooperation. Neither claim is particularly persuasive because no rational calculation of the interests of the Turkish government could justify punishing Turkish Jews or ending joint military coordination in response to any ADL statement.

 

In reality, the ADL rejects comparison of the Armenian genocide with the Holocaust because any diminution of the uniqueness of the Jewish genocide might weaken Holocaust-based arguments for the legitimacy of the State of Israel and of its brutal or murderous actions against the native Palestinian population.

 

Unlike the ADL, Stormfront does not deny, question or otherwise qualify either the Palestinian genocide or the Armenian genocide.  For the ADL to call Stormfront an extremist organization is a perfect example of the "pot calling the kettle black." 

 

Not only is the ADL at least as much an extremist organization as Stormfront, but it is much more dangerous because the ADL is far sneakier and more strategic in its planning. The ability of Jewish communal and Israel advocacy organizations to manipulate the media by gate-keeping and facilitation represents far more of a threat to American democracy than Stormfront ever could be.

 

Only the excessive power and influence of the organized Jewish community can explain how the ADL could possibly have any legitimacy as an arbiter of extremism and why Don Black's contribution to Ron Paul can become a political issue while the much more serious issue of the importance of racist Jewish or Zionist money in the 2008 presidential campaign remains a taboo subject.

 

In a message dated 11/20/2007 4:22:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Karima4483 writes:

From 

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/105349.html

 

ADL Taking Concerns To Ron Paul

11-15-7

feedback@jta.org

 

The Anti-Defamation League plans to ask Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul to distance himself from extremist groups.

 

Paul, a U.S. congressman from Texas, has come under fire for the support his campaign has enjoyed from leading white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups.

 

His campaign reportedly has accepted a donation from Don Black, the owner of the white supremacist Web site Stormfront. Sites for several extremist groups also feature prominent links supporting Paul's candidacy. ADL's assistant director of civil rights, Steven Freeman, told JTA his organization planned to communicate with Paul privately and urge him to distance himself from those groups.

 

"If he doesn't do that, then we will decide what we're going to say publicly about it," Freeman said.

 

Paul thus far has refused to return the campaign contribution from Black. In response to a question from a reporter for Reason magazine, a campaign spokesperson said, "If people who hold views that the candidate doesn't agree with, and they give to us, that's their loss."

 

The ADL previously has taken candidates to task for their ties to supremacist groups. Last year the organization slammed Larry Darby, a Democratic candidate for attorney general in Alabama, after he attended a meeting of the National Vanguard, a splinter group of the National Alliance. Darby was defeated.

 

In October 2001, the ADL commended New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani for rejecting a $10 million donation to a 9/11 relief fund from Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal. Giuliani, like Paul, is a Republican presidential candidate.

 

Sphere: Related Content