Zionist Control: Sovereign Wealth Funds?

A New Strategy for Securing the Realm: Making Global Finance Safe for Israel

by Joachim Martillo

In Overseas Funds Resist Calls for a Code of Conduct - New York Times NY Times correspondent Steven R. Weisman reported:

In October, the United States joined with Europe and Japan to call for a set of best practices to which funds would subscribe voluntarily. The practices would include pledges of nonpolitical governance structures and more disclosure of portfolio activities.

"I think we've made progress with sovereign wealth funds in convincing them of the need for this effort," said David H. McCormick, under secretary of the Treasury for international affairs. He added there was "no evidence of them making investments for anything but economic reasons." 

Nevertheless, there is a fear among many experts that, without a code, the funds may use their investments to try to exercise political leverage.

Lawrence H. Summers, the former Treasury secretary and former president of Harvard, pressed this point at a seminar at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where top officials from Russia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait said such a code seemed unnecessary in light of their track records of abstaining from political interference.

In an interview, Mr. Summers said that in some cases, the funds were not wrong to be concerned about Western xenophobia over foreign investments, but that the solution was to agree to more transparency and to disavow politics in their activities.

"I'm inclined to think that if the funds don't agree to some effort to regulate, they're asking for a lot more xenophobia," he said.

The attempt to protect our finance industry from foreign investment by creating special rules for Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) while we attempt to open up foreign markets to our investment is simply a more sophisticated form of imperialism.


Summers' finance industry protectionism (he is a part-time managing director of the investment and technology development firm D. E. Shaw & Co.) is hardly inconsistent with his views on the desirability of using developing countries as dumping grounds for the waste of developed nations.


Summers' career shows signs of connection to the secret and informal Jewish finance networks that I have mentioned in Judonia Rising: The Israel Lobby and American Society.

Israel Advocates as Thought Police

Then there are all sorts of groups and individuals that covertly and informally act as Israel advocates. Jewish cliques within Interfaith discussion groups[2] often engage in subtle Israel advocacy or enmeshment while the often-transnational Jewish networks in academia, across various professions and in the finance industry often serve Zionist purposes of exclusion of Arabs, Muslims and anti-Zionists or of control of discourse. The David Project, which works with informal networks of Jewish doctors, has inserted Zionist propaganda into the Harvard Medical School through its subsidiary X-Ray Project. [3]

The members of the Jewish finance networks trade insider information and protect each other. Membership generally requires politically correct attitudes towards Israel. Expressions of sympathy toward Palestinians can end careers — at least until Gulf and Saudi Arabs buy enough of the NY investment banks, but the networks might manage to persist with greater secrecy.

As the work of researchers like Alison Weir (http://www.ifamericansknew.org) and Laurel Leff (Buried by the Times, The Holocaust and America’s Most Important Newspaper) clearly indicates, the media industry is full of all sorts of facilitators and gatekeepers , who have a clear effect on the coverage of the conflict over Palestine even in cases where the media owners are themselves unbiased.

Even though Spielberg himself is an Israel advocate, he strayed from Zionist political correctness in Munich and was subjected to a concerted media attack. The Hollywood Crowd got the message, and the marketing of Munich ran into all sorts of "unforeseen" problems. As a result, the movie probably only made one third of reasonable expectations in gross ticket receipts, and it will probably be a long time before Spielberg deviates from the Zionist narrative to give Palestinians another 20 seconds of sympathy.

Beyond the facilitators and gatekeepers there are thousands to tens of thousands — often students or retirees — who will make faxes, letters, calls, emails or come to gatherings on behalf of organizations connected with Israel advocacy.

Summers' new wife Professor Elisa New, (DUS Barker Center 151, 496-2552, enew@fas.harvard.edu, American poetry; American literature - 1900; religion and literature; Jewish literature) belongs to the Newton Jew Cabal. She is close to the David Project and to Ruth Wisse, whose husband is the Chairman of the Board of CAMERA.


Summers became Super-Jew after a mid-life crisis that led him to divorce his gentile first wife.


The following two blog entries describe the network of the Boston-area academic and Newton Jews:

• Jacob Lassner and Nadia Abu el Haj and
• Money Jews, Brain Jews, Politics.

At the end of his article, Weisman confirms the Zionist motivation of Summers and other Jews involved in the US government and the American finance industry.

But even those sympathetic to the idea of a best-practices code say it is harder to define than it might appear.

For example, the Norway investment fund has a code of ethical investment practices, like a ban on investment in companies that pollute, make cluster bombs or sell tobacco products. But some experts [which ones?] say it may be hard to draw the line if, for example, a Persian Gulf country tries to curb an American bank's ability to do business with Israel, or if any government tries to use its influence to get the United States to give tax breaks to a company in which it has invested.

The US government at the behest of Jewish racists already interferes with the ability of US banks and corporations to do business with Sudan even though investment leading to prosperity is probably the most direct way to end the conflicts from which that country suffers.

[See the following links:

• If you liked Iraq, you will love Sudan
• 5th Question: Darfur
• Profiteering from humanitarianism
• Poisoning Human Rights Discourse
• Singing HaTikvah while inciting a disastrous US invasion
• Holoexaleipsis, Holocaust, Holosphage and Holodomor.]

The State of Israel is a criminal state comparable to (but probably worse than) Nazi Germany during the 30s. American Jews often try to make American non-Jews feel guilty for investments in 1930s Germany. Why should Gulf, Saudi, Muslim or other investors concerned with ethics be forced to use their money to help the Israeli economy?

In fact, given the history of misuse of American investment in collusion with American transnational corporations to ruin foreign countries according to Friedmanist ideology (see The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein), we Americans should

• 
  
  work to force the US government to apply ethical economic standards to its own financial and foreign policy behavior and
• 
  
  demand investigation of major Jewish players in the American economy to find out whether they are giving material aid to Zionist terrorism in defiance of the Patriot Act.

If they are, they must be stripped of all their assets and interrogated according to Dershowitzian standards in order to determine the extent of their illegal and anti-American conspiracy.

Sphere: Related Content