Posts
since Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:04:17.
Dear Professor Harrison,
Your book The Resurgence of Anti-Semitism: Jews, Israel and Liberal Opinion indicates that you do not have much background in Jewish studies and that you have not spent much time in the Palestinian occupied territories.
Because Zionists and their supporters accuse anyone critical of Israel or Zionism as anti-Semitic, revisiting the meaning of the terms "anti-Semitism" and "Jew" is worthwhile.
Who are the Jews?
Arabic uses Yahudi in the Quranic sense of a certain religious community that follows the Tawrat (Torat) Musa (Moshe). Ethnic Ashkenazim historically have used the words Jew, Yid (Yiddish) or Yehudi (Hebrew) to mean ethnic Ashkenazi. Zionists use Yehudi to refer to a mythic pan-Judaic ethnonational Volk that has a blood and soil right to Palestine.
In point of fact, ethnic Ashkenazim constitute an indigenous Eastern European ethnic group most of whose recent ancestors at one time practiced modern Rabbinic Judaism. They have precisely the same mythological scriptural Biblical connection to Palestine that ethnic Poles have. Ethnic Ashkenazim have no ancestral connection whatsoever to the ancient Roman-period Judeans or Galileans of Palestine. Those ancient populations practiced a very different religion, spoke a very different language -- Modern Israeli Hebrew is very unlike Roman period Palestinian Aramaic -- and had a very different culture.
Modern Palestinians are descendants of ancient Judeans and Galileans while Ethnic Ashkenazim are the descendants of various Eastern European, Balkan and Southern Russian populations that began to practice various forms of Judean religion since the Hellenistic period. Most Palestinians practice Islam, which is a slightly evolved version of ancient Christian-Judaism, a hybrid religion that was common in Palestine throughout the 2nd-7th century and that was probably predominant in the area during the 3rd century. Modern Rabbinic Judaism developed much later for the most part outside of Palestine and has very little resemblance to the religion that Jesus practiced.
In other words, ethnic Ashkenazim have no legitimate claim to Palestine whatsoever even though the name of their ancestral religion has an etymological connection to the geographical term Judea. Likewise, Irish are for the most part Roman Catholics, but they have no legitimate claims to Rome. If Irish seized Rome and treated the native Roman population as Eastern European ethnic Ashkenazim treated (and treat) the native population of Palestine, we would call such Irish invaders murderous genocidal thieves and interlopers.
Religious Ashkenazim have the same sort of relationship to Arab Jews that religious Poles (Roman Catholics) have to religious Sicilians (also Roman Catholics).
In short, Zionism is a complete scam that justifies theft and murder. Zionist colonizers and racist Ashkenazi Americans are conning patriotic Americans into supporting Zionist crimes.
What is Anti-Semitism?
Despite the claims of the ethnic Ashkenazi anti-Gentile and anti-Catholic pogrom and persecution polemic, there is no uniform phenomena of Judeophobia over the last two millennia. Racist Ashkenazim have fabricated the idea of universal anti-Semitism to justify contempt and abusive practices both against non-Jews in Central and Eastern Europe and also against the native population in Palestine, the whole Levant, the entire Middle East and the whole Islamic world.
Instances of various forms of Judeophobia are completely explicable in the larger historical context. For instance, racist Ashkenazim like to rant about the mistreatment of German Jews during the wars of the Reformation. Pseudoscholars that express this sort of nonsense invariably neglect to mention that at this time period German Catholics and German Protestants were slaughtering one another mercilessly. In this context the situation of German Jews was good by comparison. In fact, German Jews as unbelievers were trading with both sides. In war time such an activity was inherently suspicious especially because some German Jewish merchants were trading in intelligence.
Real anti-Semitism is a very specific phenomenon of the late 19th century and early twentieth century. It attempts to justify hatred of Jews as Jews on the basis of pseudoscientific biological determinist, social Darwinist, economic Darwinist or religious Darwinist principles. This type of hatred was mostly confined to Central and Eastern Europe and simply does not exist today to any meaningful extent.
The Legitimacy of Hating Racist Ashkenazi Americans and Zionist Colonizers
In 1947-8 racist Eastern European Zionist colonizers stole and ethnically cleansed Palestine in an orgy of genocidal aggressive violence. Since 1948 racist Zionist colonizers have maintained their control of stolen Palestine (the territory of the State of Israel) through aggressive genocidal violence and have extended their murderous control beyond the lands seized in 1947-8 to occupy the rest of Palestine and to further oppress and abuse the native population. Racist ethnic Ashkenazim throughout the world (and especially ethnic Ashkenazim in the USA at 90% levels according to AJC statistics) identify with Zionist colonizers. Racist ethnic Ashkenazi Americans use their influence to support Zionist crimes and to thwart attempts to sanction the criminal Zionist state that controls both stolen and occupied Palestine.
Naturally, all Arabs, Muslims and any human being committed to justice and decency hate and despise the racist Zionist colonizers in Palestine as well as their racist ethnic Ashkenazi American supporters in the USA. Such hatred is not anti-Semitism because the hatred is the natural response to the murder and mayhem that Zionists or racist Ashkenazi Americans either commit or support. Decent people hate Zionist colonizers and racist Ashkenazi Americans not because of what they are but because of what they do. Hating Zionist colonizers and racist Ashkenazi Americans today is exactly comparable to hating Nazi Germans for abusing Jews and dissenters within Germany during the 1930s and for invading and colonizing Eastern Europe in 1939. (Of course, all decent and patriotic Americans should esteem and honor all Ashkenazi Americans that as true loyal Americans reject and condemn Zionism categorically and without reservation.)
The Apologetics of Zionism
Apologists for Zionism and the State of Israel typically make two arguments that should disgust all patriotic Americans.
They argue that Americans should ignore the crimes of Israeli Zionists because there are many evils in the world, and some of them might be more serious than the crimes that Zionists commit. Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler would not have faulted such logic.
This specious and hypocritical contention was common in the 1850s public debate over American slavery, and revisiting the politics of the Abolitionist movement is relevant to any discussion of the State of Israel.
Zionism is a form of violent state sponsored racism that is exactly analogous to American slavery. Slavers stole Africans by means of terrorism, aggression and force. Slavers maintained slavery by means of terrorism, aggression and force. Racist Eastern European Zionists stole Palestine from the native population by means of terrorism, aggression and force. Racist Israeli Zionists hold stolen Palestine by means of terrorism, aggression and force.
Southern slavers might have asked why abolitionists in Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire worried about slavery in the South when serfdom existed in imperial Russia. Antislavery Northerners could reply as anti-Zionist Americans can today that American policy and law have made them complicit in slavery then and in Zionism today. When the State of Israel commits mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide (according to the definition of Rafael Lemkin), the alliance between the USA and Israel renders every American a co-conspirator just as The Fugitive Slave Act and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision forced every single American to support slavery. Just as every American before the Civil War was contaminated with the evil of slavery, every American today has been contaminated with the evil of Zionism. All patriotic Americans have a categorical ethical imperative to oppose, denounce and combat Zionism in every way possible.
Because the first Zionist argument is so weak and so morally repugnant, defenders of Zionism attempt to distract readers from its flaws by combining it with the second proposition that identifying Zionism as a form of Nazism is simply an illegitimate political tactic and an expression of anti-Semitism.
Nazism is a fairly well defined ideology that combines extremist organic nationalism, ethnic fundamentalism, blood-and-soil nationalism, scientific racism, economic racism, primordialism, biological determinism, social Darwinism, collectivism, anti-individualism, populism and contempt for the bourgeoisie with undemocratic politics that may be cloaked by formal democratic procedures. Most Central and Eastern European ethnic groups developed their own forms of Nazism during the late 19th or early 20th century.
Even though determining whether Zionism is a form of Nazism should be a straightforward matter of scholarship, Zionists and their supporters want patriotic Americans to reject a priore the possibility that Zionism is an ethnic Ashkenazi form of Nazism. In other words, of all Eastern European ethnic groups, Ashkenazim are somehow incapable of being Nazis. Ethnic Ashkenazi chauvinists believe that Jews are somehow ethically superior to all non-Jews. This idea belongs to the traditional Ashkenazi anti-gentile polemic. While this bigoted belief predates Zionism by several hundred years, it is in fact very similar to the German Nazi idea that Aryans are superior to all non-Aryans.
It is a short step from the racist Ashkenazi belief in Jewish ethical superiority to the racist assertion that Jewish historical, ethnic, or national rights to Palestine are superior to the human rights of Palestinians.
Zionist writers like Herzl, Nordau, Jabotinsky, Borochov, Ben Tzvi, Smolenskin, Pinsker, Ben-Gurion, Arlosoroff, Gordon, Buber et. al. extended such racist Ashkenazi thinking into a complete political ideology. By 1914, Zionists developed a complete system of Nazi thought that anticipated every idea found in Hitler's Mein Kampf with the obvious ethnic substitutions. Any genuine and honest political scientist that has studied and compared German Nazism and Zionism must conclude that Zionism is Ashkenazi Nazism.
In its purest form German Nazism is the assertion that Aryans have the right to plunder and kill non-Aryans. In its purest form Ashkenazi Nazism or Zionism is the assertion that Jews have the right to plunder and kill non-Jews. There is no genuine difference between German Nazi and Zionist thinking.
No patriotic American committed to fundamental American principles of democracy, antiracism and human rights can support the alliance between the USA and Zionist Israel. Any American that sympathizes with Zionism or the State of Israel betrays fundamental American ideals and is a traitor to the USA in thought if not in deed.
Zionists and their supporters often babble rather incoherently that the State of Israel received legitimacy in 1948 because of the Holocaust. Not only does the idea that the Holocaust confers legitimacy to Zionism violate causality because Ashkenazi Nazism originated about 50 years before the German Nazi mass murder of Jews, but most seven year olds understand that two wrongs do not make a right.
When Zionists claim that world conferred legitimacy in 1948, they are usually referring to the 1947 UN partition proposal. The General Assembly passed it
Your book The Resurgence of Anti-Semitism: Jews, Israel and Liberal Opinion indicates that you do not have much background in Jewish studies and that you have not spent much time in the Palestinian occupied territories.
Because Zionists and their supporters accuse anyone critical of Israel or Zionism as anti-Semitic, revisiting the meaning of the terms "anti-Semitism" and "Jew" is worthwhile.
Who are the Jews?
Arabic uses Yahudi in the Quranic sense of a certain religious community that follows the Tawrat (Torat) Musa (Moshe). Ethnic Ashkenazim historically have used the words Jew, Yid (Yiddish) or Yehudi (Hebrew) to mean ethnic Ashkenazi. Zionists use Yehudi to refer to a mythic pan-Judaic ethnonational Volk that has a blood and soil right to Palestine.
In point of fact, ethnic Ashkenazim constitute an indigenous Eastern European ethnic group most of whose recent ancestors at one time practiced modern Rabbinic Judaism. They have precisely the same mythological scriptural Biblical connection to Palestine that ethnic Poles have. Ethnic Ashkenazim have no ancestral connection whatsoever to the ancient Roman-period Judeans or Galileans of Palestine. Those ancient populations practiced a very different religion, spoke a very different language -- Modern Israeli Hebrew is very unlike Roman period Palestinian Aramaic -- and had a very different culture.
Modern Palestinians are descendants of ancient Judeans and Galileans while Ethnic Ashkenazim are the descendants of various Eastern European, Balkan and Southern Russian populations that began to practice various forms of Judean religion since the Hellenistic period. Most Palestinians practice Islam, which is a slightly evolved version of ancient Christian-Judaism, a hybrid religion that was common in Palestine throughout the 2nd-7th century and that was probably predominant in the area during the 3rd century. Modern Rabbinic Judaism developed much later for the most part outside of Palestine and has very little resemblance to the religion that Jesus practiced.
In other words, ethnic Ashkenazim have no legitimate claim to Palestine whatsoever even though the name of their ancestral religion has an etymological connection to the geographical term Judea. Likewise, Irish are for the most part Roman Catholics, but they have no legitimate claims to Rome. If Irish seized Rome and treated the native Roman population as Eastern European ethnic Ashkenazim treated (and treat) the native population of Palestine, we would call such Irish invaders murderous genocidal thieves and interlopers.
Religious Ashkenazim have the same sort of relationship to Arab Jews that religious Poles (Roman Catholics) have to religious Sicilians (also Roman Catholics).
In short, Zionism is a complete scam that justifies theft and murder. Zionist colonizers and racist Ashkenazi Americans are conning patriotic Americans into supporting Zionist crimes.
What is Anti-Semitism?
Despite the claims of the ethnic Ashkenazi anti-Gentile and anti-Catholic pogrom and persecution polemic, there is no uniform phenomena of Judeophobia over the last two millennia. Racist Ashkenazim have fabricated the idea of universal anti-Semitism to justify contempt and abusive practices both against non-Jews in Central and Eastern Europe and also against the native population in Palestine, the whole Levant, the entire Middle East and the whole Islamic world.
Instances of various forms of Judeophobia are completely explicable in the larger historical context. For instance, racist Ashkenazim like to rant about the mistreatment of German Jews during the wars of the Reformation. Pseudoscholars that express this sort of nonsense invariably neglect to mention that at this time period German Catholics and German Protestants were slaughtering one another mercilessly. In this context the situation of German Jews was good by comparison. In fact, German Jews as unbelievers were trading with both sides. In war time such an activity was inherently suspicious especially because some German Jewish merchants were trading in intelligence.
Real anti-Semitism is a very specific phenomenon of the late 19th century and early twentieth century. It attempts to justify hatred of Jews as Jews on the basis of pseudoscientific biological determinist, social Darwinist, economic Darwinist or religious Darwinist principles. This type of hatred was mostly confined to Central and Eastern Europe and simply does not exist today to any meaningful extent.
The Legitimacy of Hating Racist Ashkenazi Americans and Zionist Colonizers
In 1947-8 racist Eastern European Zionist colonizers stole and ethnically cleansed Palestine in an orgy of genocidal aggressive violence. Since 1948 racist Zionist colonizers have maintained their control of stolen Palestine (the territory of the State of Israel) through aggressive genocidal violence and have extended their murderous control beyond the lands seized in 1947-8 to occupy the rest of Palestine and to further oppress and abuse the native population. Racist ethnic Ashkenazim throughout the world (and especially ethnic Ashkenazim in the USA at 90% levels according to AJC statistics) identify with Zionist colonizers. Racist ethnic Ashkenazi Americans use their influence to support Zionist crimes and to thwart attempts to sanction the criminal Zionist state that controls both stolen and occupied Palestine.
Naturally, all Arabs, Muslims and any human being committed to justice and decency hate and despise the racist Zionist colonizers in Palestine as well as their racist ethnic Ashkenazi American supporters in the USA. Such hatred is not anti-Semitism because the hatred is the natural response to the murder and mayhem that Zionists or racist Ashkenazi Americans either commit or support. Decent people hate Zionist colonizers and racist Ashkenazi Americans not because of what they are but because of what they do. Hating Zionist colonizers and racist Ashkenazi Americans today is exactly comparable to hating Nazi Germans for abusing Jews and dissenters within Germany during the 1930s and for invading and colonizing Eastern Europe in 1939. (Of course, all decent and patriotic Americans should esteem and honor all Ashkenazi Americans that as true loyal Americans reject and condemn Zionism categorically and without reservation.)
The Apologetics of Zionism
Apologists for Zionism and the State of Israel typically make two arguments that should disgust all patriotic Americans.
They argue that Americans should ignore the crimes of Israeli Zionists because there are many evils in the world, and some of them might be more serious than the crimes that Zionists commit. Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler would not have faulted such logic.
This specious and hypocritical contention was common in the 1850s public debate over American slavery, and revisiting the politics of the Abolitionist movement is relevant to any discussion of the State of Israel.
Zionism is a form of violent state sponsored racism that is exactly analogous to American slavery. Slavers stole Africans by means of terrorism, aggression and force. Slavers maintained slavery by means of terrorism, aggression and force. Racist Eastern European Zionists stole Palestine from the native population by means of terrorism, aggression and force. Racist Israeli Zionists hold stolen Palestine by means of terrorism, aggression and force.
Southern slavers might have asked why abolitionists in Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire worried about slavery in the South when serfdom existed in imperial Russia. Antislavery Northerners could reply as anti-Zionist Americans can today that American policy and law have made them complicit in slavery then and in Zionism today. When the State of Israel commits mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide (according to the definition of Rafael Lemkin), the alliance between the USA and Israel renders every American a co-conspirator just as The Fugitive Slave Act and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision forced every single American to support slavery. Just as every American before the Civil War was contaminated with the evil of slavery, every American today has been contaminated with the evil of Zionism. All patriotic Americans have a categorical ethical imperative to oppose, denounce and combat Zionism in every way possible.
Because the first Zionist argument is so weak and so morally repugnant, defenders of Zionism attempt to distract readers from its flaws by combining it with the second proposition that identifying Zionism as a form of Nazism is simply an illegitimate political tactic and an expression of anti-Semitism.
Nazism is a fairly well defined ideology that combines extremist organic nationalism, ethnic fundamentalism, blood-and-soil nationalism, scientific racism, economic racism, primordialism, biological determinism, social Darwinism, collectivism, anti-individualism, populism and contempt for the bourgeoisie with undemocratic politics that may be cloaked by formal democratic procedures. Most Central and Eastern European ethnic groups developed their own forms of Nazism during the late 19th or early 20th century.
Even though determining whether Zionism is a form of Nazism should be a straightforward matter of scholarship, Zionists and their supporters want patriotic Americans to reject a priore the possibility that Zionism is an ethnic Ashkenazi form of Nazism. In other words, of all Eastern European ethnic groups, Ashkenazim are somehow incapable of being Nazis. Ethnic Ashkenazi chauvinists believe that Jews are somehow ethically superior to all non-Jews. This idea belongs to the traditional Ashkenazi anti-gentile polemic. While this bigoted belief predates Zionism by several hundred years, it is in fact very similar to the German Nazi idea that Aryans are superior to all non-Aryans.
It is a short step from the racist Ashkenazi belief in Jewish ethical superiority to the racist assertion that Jewish historical, ethnic, or national rights to Palestine are superior to the human rights of Palestinians.
Zionist writers like Herzl, Nordau, Jabotinsky, Borochov, Ben Tzvi, Smolenskin, Pinsker, Ben-Gurion, Arlosoroff, Gordon, Buber et. al. extended such racist Ashkenazi thinking into a complete political ideology. By 1914, Zionists developed a complete system of Nazi thought that anticipated every idea found in Hitler's Mein Kampf with the obvious ethnic substitutions. Any genuine and honest political scientist that has studied and compared German Nazism and Zionism must conclude that Zionism is Ashkenazi Nazism.
In its purest form German Nazism is the assertion that Aryans have the right to plunder and kill non-Aryans. In its purest form Ashkenazi Nazism or Zionism is the assertion that Jews have the right to plunder and kill non-Jews. There is no genuine difference between German Nazi and Zionist thinking.
No patriotic American committed to fundamental American principles of democracy, antiracism and human rights can support the alliance between the USA and Zionist Israel. Any American that sympathizes with Zionism or the State of Israel betrays fundamental American ideals and is a traitor to the USA in thought if not in deed.
Zionists and their supporters often babble rather incoherently that the State of Israel received legitimacy in 1948 because of the Holocaust. Not only does the idea that the Holocaust confers legitimacy to Zionism violate causality because Ashkenazi Nazism originated about 50 years before the German Nazi mass murder of Jews, but most seven year olds understand that two wrongs do not make a right.
When Zionists claim that world conferred legitimacy in 1948, they are usually referring to the 1947 UN partition proposal. The General Assembly passed it
- because Truman had no problem with sacrificing the human rights of Palestinians to his quest for the votes of ethnic Ashkenazi Americans in the 1948 presidential election and
- because the UN was dominated by Western powers that had not yet renounced colonialist racism.
Political expediency and plain racism do not legitimize injustice. The UN partition proposal was completely illegitimate. It violated UN principles and was simply wrong like Dred Scott.
If Zionists believe that Zionism and the State of Israel are so clearly based in right and justice, they should support an open discussion and national plebiscite in the USA to address whether it makes any sense on ideological, ethical, or pragmatic grounds for the USA to support Zionism and the State of Israel. When racist ethnic Ashkenazim rant incoherently about anti-Semitism to squelch debate, there is reason to suspect that their commitment to racist ethnic Ashkenazi tribalism transcends their loyalty to American principles of free discourse.
The issue of Palestine is simply an ethical nobrainer
- Zionism is racist because it presupposes that the ethnic, national or historical rights of Jews to Palestine are superior to the human rights of the native population. That is racism plain and simple.
- Racist Eastern European colonists stole the country from the native population.
- Their crime spans 3 centuries.
Zionists have not changed their song and dance since the 1890s when Herzl was arguing that the Jewish settlement could serve as a colonial surrogate population for the British Empire. Israeli spokesmen, American Zionists and Neocons argue that the State of Israel should serve the same role in an American Imperium today.
I am not going to banter with trivialities. Palestinians are the native population of Palestine.
Racist Eastern Europeans colonized Palestine and stole it.
All the textual, historical, archeological, and linguistic data indicates that Ashkenazim are an indigenous Eastern European population with practically no ancestral connection to Palestine (just like other Eastern Europeans) while Palestinians are the descendants of the Greco-Roman Judean population of Palestine. Zionists merely justify their crimes in the way that German Racists and Nazis justified their crimes by mythological primordialist nonsense. But suppose Ashkenazim were descended from Greco-Roman Judeans of some sort (at least 3/4s of Greco-Roman Judeans lived outside Palestine). So what? Vienna was founded 2000 years ago by Celts. Do the modern Irish have a legitimate claim to the modern city?
Zionism in the 21st century is the ethical equivalent of Slavery in the 19th century.
Racist Eastern Europeans stole Palestine by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence. Slavers stole Africans out of the homes by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence.
Racist Zionist colonizers hold onto the country that they stole by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence. Slavery was maintained by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence.
Categorical opposition to Zionism is the defining issue of peace and justice in the 21st century. 300 million Arabs, 1.2 billion Muslims, most of Europe, the Far East and Latin American cannot take any American seriously when he asserts a commitment to peace and justice unless he demands the eradication of Zionism in the ME just as Abolitionists demanded the categorical and unequivocal eradication of slavery.
Anyone that supports or is willing to tolerate Zionism is a racist. Racist American Zionists, Neocons, and Apocalyptic Evangelical Fundamentalists have formed an alliance against peace and justice on the basis of commitment to the maintenance of a racist Zionist colony in Palestine. When I watch how this alliance is driving the USA to betray fundamental American principles, I consider this alliance and Zionist/Neocon subversion a menace to me as an American.
The house is divided between two irreconcilable ideologies. One ideology is committed to American ideals, peace, justice, democracy and human rights; the other supports racist, genocidal, undemocratic, colonialism in ME and will destroy the fundamental principles of the USA to maintain the Zionist colony. A house so divided cannot stand.
Within 30 years we Americans will fight a civil war on this issue.
By American standards terrorism against Israelis is completely justified, for Israelis are the ethical equivalent of antebellum Southerners and Slavers. Just think Nat Turner or John Brown. Any Zionist colonizer that does not actively fight against Zionism is complicit and shares guilt by American standards.
Sincerely yours,
Joachim Martillo
Sphere: Related Content
I am not going to banter with trivialities. Palestinians are the native population of Palestine.
Racist Eastern Europeans colonized Palestine and stole it.
All the textual, historical, archeological, and linguistic data indicates that Ashkenazim are an indigenous Eastern European population with practically no ancestral connection to Palestine (just like other Eastern Europeans) while Palestinians are the descendants of the Greco-Roman Judean population of Palestine. Zionists merely justify their crimes in the way that German Racists and Nazis justified their crimes by mythological primordialist nonsense. But suppose Ashkenazim were descended from Greco-Roman Judeans of some sort (at least 3/4s of Greco-Roman Judeans lived outside Palestine). So what? Vienna was founded 2000 years ago by Celts. Do the modern Irish have a legitimate claim to the modern city?
Zionism in the 21st century is the ethical equivalent of Slavery in the 19th century.
Racist Eastern Europeans stole Palestine by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence. Slavers stole Africans out of the homes by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence.
Racist Zionist colonizers hold onto the country that they stole by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence. Slavery was maintained by means of force, terrorism, aggression, murder and violence.
Categorical opposition to Zionism is the defining issue of peace and justice in the 21st century. 300 million Arabs, 1.2 billion Muslims, most of Europe, the Far East and Latin American cannot take any American seriously when he asserts a commitment to peace and justice unless he demands the eradication of Zionism in the ME just as Abolitionists demanded the categorical and unequivocal eradication of slavery.
Anyone that supports or is willing to tolerate Zionism is a racist. Racist American Zionists, Neocons, and Apocalyptic Evangelical Fundamentalists have formed an alliance against peace and justice on the basis of commitment to the maintenance of a racist Zionist colony in Palestine. When I watch how this alliance is driving the USA to betray fundamental American principles, I consider this alliance and Zionist/Neocon subversion a menace to me as an American.
The house is divided between two irreconcilable ideologies. One ideology is committed to American ideals, peace, justice, democracy and human rights; the other supports racist, genocidal, undemocratic, colonialism in ME and will destroy the fundamental principles of the USA to maintain the Zionist colony. A house so divided cannot stand.
Within 30 years we Americans will fight a civil war on this issue.
By American standards terrorism against Israelis is completely justified, for Israelis are the ethical equivalent of antebellum Southerners and Slavers. Just think Nat Turner or John Brown. Any Zionist colonizer that does not actively fight against Zionism is complicit and shares guilt by American standards.
Sincerely yours,
Joachim Martillo
4 comments:
Thanks for an excellent, thought-provoking piece.
Sorry this is off-topic - In a piece titled, "Nazi Holocaust in Context of Soviet Holosphage and Zionist Holoexaleipsis", you wrote:
"Since the opening of Soviet and Eastern European archives to Western researchers, there has been a revolution in scholarly understanding of the beginnings and early history of the Soviet Union."
Could you suggest a few books that cover this history?
The definitive work on the subject has not been written.
Both The Jewish Century by Yuri Slezkine (2004) and Language in Time of Revolution contain lots of useful information even if Slezkine expressed his material in a weird and even if Harshav's Zionist prejudices often lead him to conclusions not supported by his own findings.
Solzhenitsyn tried to write the definitive work in Two Hundred Years Together, but he did not have the necessary skillset in Jewish studies and does not delve as deeply or as sympathetically into the Polish historical context as I believe he should have.
Because of Jewish sensitivity, our Jewish-dominated publishing industry has not provided a translation of Solzhenitsyn's work even though the same people that suppress Solzhenitsyn's book would almost certainly condemn Muslims for reacting negatively to books that demonize or ridicule Islam.
Yeah, it couldn't be that Solzhenitsyn published an absolutely tasteless apologetic for slavophiles.. I'm sure blaming Jews for the pogroms was just the sort of academic contribution the English-speaking world was clamouring for! If only the Jewish-controlled publishing industry wasn't so obsessed with re-printing translations of Mein Kampf..
Despite the efforts of Jewish racists and their panderers to obscure the facts with sarcasm, anti-Jewish pogroms in the Czarist empire did not start until after at least 30 years of Jewish sabotage, radical violence, and targeted assassinations including Czar Alexander II.
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated.