Help Fight Judonia!

Please help sustain EAAZI in the battle against Jewish Zionist transnational political economic manipulation and corruption.

For more info click here or here!

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Contrasting New Yorker Caricatures

None of the New Yorker covers below are particular satirical.

Because they constitute charicatures that try to drive home a certain truth by exaggeration, no one should be surprised at the anger of the Obamas.

If the cartoonist had drawn the Obama cover as an overhead slide in a lecture given by someone looking suspiciously like Robert Spencer, Martin Peretz, Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz, John Hagee, James Dobson or some other ideological scare-monger, the cartoon might have served as clear satire, but the effort would have been tricky.

Dobson might have worked best if the cover had been captioned with the Dobson figuring blithely stating, "So what if I distort the facts? Obama distorts the Bible," but it would have been old news, and I am not sure it would have worked.

Barack might benefit from The New Yorker cover if the controversy proves sufficiently cathartic to drive this nonsense out of the consciousness of the American body politic before September.



Michelle as Angela Davis; Barack as Muslim cleric


George W. Bush as Nero


The Real Boss


George W. Bush as Cowboy with Blinders


Cheney as an Incendiary Device
Sphere: Related Content

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Obama's ratings are going down due to the cartoon plus the disaffected liberals. It is important to keep McCain out of the presidency.

Joachim Martillo said...

We’re Not Laughing at You, or With You seems to agree with my analysis.

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated.