[Muslim Girl] President Obama Supports Manhattan Mosque

President Obama states below with regard to the lower Manhattan Mosque, "... as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country."

Unfortunately, not only does Obama ignore the real issues, which are Zionism, the State of Israel, and the machinations of racist fanatic Jewish Zionists (see Krauthammer screed suggests that the mosque flap is about Israel), but  he has failed to put his money where his mouth is by ordering the FBI and the US Attorneys to start pursuing the real criminals, who are: 

• supporters of Zionist terrorism and 
• the Jewish Zionist oligarchy (consisting both of a vicious plutocracy and of a rabid intelligentsia) that is funding, organizing, and mobilizing an Islamophobic movement to commit the federal crime of conspiring against the rights of Muslim American US citizens. 

[Note 1: This racist Zionist conspiracy is working overtime to extend this movement throughout all Western nations and India. See 

Wilders' Columbia Song and Dance

 and Reframing Post-9/11 Islamophobic Frame-Ups -- the chart of Islamophobic links in the latter article is most relevant.

Note 2: The Krauthammer article refers to the attempt to build a Carmelite monastery at Auschwitz. The reaction of Krauthammer and far too many Jews to the Carmelites betrays the racist fanatic bigotry that pervades the Jewish community. The Carmelites wanted to build a monastery on the site where ethnic Poles were martyred -- often for their commitment to Catholicism. For the most part Jews died or were killed in another location, which is a part of the area of the concentration camp but not part of the memorial. The Carmelites were absolutely right, and Pope John Paul II simply caved into another racist Jewish Zionist effort 

• to strengthen the legitimizing narrative of the State of Israel through control of discourse about mass murder during WW2 and 
• to dump on ethnic Poles, who historically are both the most Catholic and also -- despite the claims of more than a century of Jewish propaganda -- the most philojudaic population in Europe, for the crime of attempting to create a Polish state, in which all citizens whether of aristocratic, non-aristocratic or Jewish ancestry would be equal.]

President Obama Supports Manhattan Mosque

Last night, President Barack Obama held an iftar dinner at the White House where he delivered a truly amazing speech on the controversy surrounding the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero. In support of the mosque, he mentions the importance of freedom of religion for all Americans, and reiterates that those who carried out the attacks on 9/11 are in no way representing the true religion of Islam.

Recently, attention has been focused on the construction of mosques in certain communities – particularly in New York. Now, we must all recognize and respect the sensitivities surrounding the development of lower Manhattan. The 9/11 attacks were a deeply traumatic event for our country. The pain and suffering experienced by those who lost loved ones is unimaginable. So I understand the emotions that this issue engenders. Ground Zero is, indeed, hallowed ground.
But let me be clear: as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are. The writ of our Founders must endure.

We must never forget those who we lost so tragically on 9/11, and we must always honor those who have led our response to that attack – from the firefighters who charged up smoke-filled staircases, to our troops who are serving in Afghanistan today. And let us always remember who we are fighting against, and what we are fighting for. Our enemies respect no freedom of religion. Al Qaeda’s cause is not Islam – it is a gross distortion of Islam. These are not religious leaders – these are terrorists who murder innocent men, women and children. In fact, al Qaeda has killed more Muslims than people of any other religion – and that list of victims includes innocent Muslims who were killed on 9/11.

That is who we are fighting against. And the reason that we will win this fight is not simply the strength of our arms – it is the strength of our values. The democracy that we uphold. The freedoms that we cherish. The laws that we apply without regard to race or religion; wealth or status. Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect to those who are different from us – a way of life that stands in stark contrast to the nihilism of those who attacked us on that September morning, and who continue to plot against us today.

Sphere: Related Content

21st Century Strange Fruit

If racist Jewish Zionists like Daniel Pipes, Pam Geller, Joe Kaufman, Roz Rothstein, Charles Jacobs, Matthew Levitt, Jonathan Schanzer, Marty Peretz, Larry Summers, Bob Kowell, et. al. had their wishes come true, the strange fruit hanging from from the trees would be the bodies of Arab and Muslim Americans.
Sphere: Related Content

[Ali Abunimah] וְזִרְמַ֥ת סוּסִ֖ים זִרְמָתָֽם

The Zionists have revived the German Nazi Nuremberg Laws with the obvious substitution of Jewish Zionist for Aryan Übermensch and of Palestinian for Jewish Untermensch.

Man convicted of rape for consensual sex with woman but told her he was Jewish (English)

The following is translated, courtesy of Dena Shunra, from this source: http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/134/635.html

Jail time for Arab who impersonated a Jew and raped through fraud

A court sentenced a resident of East Jerusalem who lied to a young woman and told her that he was Jewish in order to have sexual relations with her to a year in a half of prison time. “Protect the public from such criminals.”

By Shmuel Mittelman, 19 July 2010 14:38

Sabar Kashour, a young man from East Jerusalem, was sentenced today (Monday) to 18 months in prison after having defrauded and thereby raped and committed indecent acts upon a Jewish young woman, who only yielded to him because she thought he was a Jew. Additionally, the judges – Deputy Presiding Justice Zvi Segal, Moshe Dror, and Yoram Noam required Kashour to pay the complainant financial compensation amounting to NIS 10,000.

The prosecution representative, Adv. Daniel Vittman, argued that Kashour had indeed carried out his plot without the use of force, but that he had dissipated her ability to object to his actions by means of the false representation about his personal situation – [claiming that he was] a Jewish bachelor interested in a significant romantic relationship. In this way he abused her desire for a deep emotional relationship, which was the only reason that she agreed to have sexual relations with him.

According to the indictment, to which Kashour (30) entered a guilty plea, he presented himself to a young woman whom he met in the center of Jerusalem in 2008 as a Jewish bachelor interested in a significant romantic relationship, despite the fact that he is married.

He invited her to accompany him to a building on Hillel Street. When they came to the top floor, Kashour undressed the young woman and had intercourse with her, with her consent, that had been fraudulently achieved, as stated above. After having carried out his scheme, he departed from the building and left her naked, on the top floor of that building.

“Not a ‘classic’ act of rape”

The prosecution first claimed that the complainant actively and significantly objected to the events, but in the course of the trial the young woman testified that she had agreed to the action because she had thought that the person in question was a Jew. In light of that the indictment was amended, and the defendant was accused of rape and indecent actions by way of fraud.

Kashour accepted partial responsibility for the crimes of rape and indecent actions, but claimed that the deeds were carried out with the full consent of the complainant. The Probation Service was of the impression that in the course of his detention the defendant underwent “a process of soul-searching,” and that he was investing effort in living a normative lifestyle. For this reason the Service recommended that a short term of imprisonment, to be served in community service, be deemed sufficient.

Defense Counsel Adv. Adnan Aladin asked that the positive report by the Probation Service be taken into account. He said that this report indicated his client’s “high potential for rehabilitation.”

He asked that “appropriate proportions be maintained” between the actions and the mete penalty, and stressed that Kashour had no criminal record, admitted to the actions ascribed to him and took responsibility for his actions. For this reason he asked that a sentence of six months of community service be deemed sufficient.

Justice Segal stated that there was no dispute about the fact that the defendant had committed the crime of rape upon the complainant. He had admitted to doing so, and this was why he had been convicted, by force of law. “Indeed,” he stressed, “we do not have before us a ‘class’ case of rape – by force – and the indictment initially filed, which had indicated significant objection by the complainant to the actions by the defendant, had been amended further in the proceedings, after hearing her testimony, when it became clear that the actions were indeed carried out with her consent, but that it had been fraudulently obtained, relying on false representation. Has she not been of the opinion that he was a Jewish bachelor interested in a significant

“Basic human obtuseness”

Segal added that the rehabilitation of the defendant did indeed seem accessible and possible, but “with all possible goodwill and intention to meet him part of the way and reduce his punishment inasmuch as possible, I do not believe that this is the case where a prison term can be served in the form of community service.” Moreover, in his opinion serving a prison term does not cancel out existing rehabilitation achievements nor negate possible future achievements.

The judge stated that “the Court must protect the public interest against sophisticated criminals with a smooth tongue and sweet talking, who can lead astray innocent victims at the unbearable price of the sanctity of their bodies and souls.”

He stated that “when the foundation of trust between people falls away, especially in matters so sensitive, intimate, and fateful, the Court must stand firm on the side of the victims – actual and potential – to protect their well-being. Otherwise they will be abused, manipulated, cheated, and the cost will be a tolerable, token penalty.”

Segal further added that: “one cannot know or fully understand what the complainant felt after the defendant left the building, leaving her behind – naked, at the top floor. The realization of the truth after such a deceit cannot be easy; it requires a sturdy spirit and faith in the good things that are still in store, in the future. Having done what he did the defendant displayed basic human obtuseness toward his victim, as if she were only the means to satisfy his desires, and nothing more.”

Sphere: Related Content

Jessica Stern's Real Psychopathic Denial

Did Stanley Levitt Rape Matthew Levitt at Brookline's Maimonides School?

Harvard Kennedy School lecturer Jessica Stern made a big splash recently

• by going public with the story of a rape that she suffered as a teenager and
• by linking terrorism to sexual violence.

Here are an article and an NPR interview addressing the subject:

• Terrorism Expert No Longer In 'Denial' About Her Rape
• Jessica Stern on Terror, Trauma, and Memory.

I have listened to enough of Stern's lectures and spoken with her sufficiently to be fairly certain that she is a dope and a great example of yet another Jew in academia, who could not possibly have obtained her position without immense assistance from corrupt Jewish social networking.

As a racist Jew, Stern has consistently skewed her data tremendously by mostly ignoring the most important 19th, 20th, and 21st century example of terrorism: that of often disproportionately female Eastern European ethnic Ashkenazi terrorists in Eastern Europe, the Czarist Empire, the Soviet Union, and Palestine. (See Jewish Peril 1933 Versus 2009.) It is almost needless to mention that the FBI has been so impressed by Stern's distorted racist Jewish Zionist scholarship that the Bureau has recognized her efforts against international terrorism.

Not only is Stern's new thesis "that many religious extremists had been sexually traumatized" so silly that it hardly bares refutation, but she has never investigated the role ethnic Ashkenazi rape fantasies directed at non-Jewish women have played and continue to play in Jewish terrorism even though such dark thoughts would seem highly relevant to her theory. (See The Magnes Zionist: Kristol and the Shikse.)

Did John Brown have living slavers hacked to pieces in Bleeding Kansas because he suffered sexual trauma as a child? No biography of Brown has made such a suggestion. American slavers constitute the 19th century ethical equivalent of modern Jewish Zionists. Thus by American precedent and history blowing up or otherwise killing Zionists in the struggle against violent state-sponsored racism is completely legitimate, heroic, and admirable. The issue of sexual trauma is completely irrelevant.

Yet there is a form of terrorism that may connect with sexual trauma. Boston-bred Matthew Levitt, who has made a career of terrorizing the American Muslim community, attended Brookline's Maimonides School while sexual predator Stanley Levitt was active. (See Sex Abuse Case Against Rabbi Raises Larger Issues.)

 Because Maimonides is a very twisted extremist racist Zionist yeshiva (Jewish madrasa), Levitt's sick Islamophobia could perhaps be explained by osmotic absorption of the fanatic hateful ideals that permeate the intellectual culture of the school, but the almost sexual glee that Levitt has taken in putting innocent American Muslims into jail and in destroying their families does have the appearance of overcompensation for having been corn-holed by a sexual predator like Stanley Levitt (possibly a relative?)

More investigation of the component of sexual perversity in Jewish Bolshevism and Jewish Zionism is desperately needed. Because Jewish Zionists dominate US policy-making with regard to the ME and SW Asia, the topic seems far more important than the ongoing microscopic media examination of 10-20 year old allegations of sexual abuse by Catholic priests. One has to wonder whether Jewish media facilitators and gatekeepers have made a conscious decision to focus on the Catholic Church to distract from the far more serious issue of Jewish sexual predation.

Sphere: Related Content

[Window Into Palestine] Muslims need to tackle Jewish Islamophobia

Finally, someone else is arguing that confronting Jewish Islamophobic incitement is a duty for all Palestine supporters and for all Muslims.

Muslims need to tackle Jewish Islamophobia

Khalid Amayreh

From Sydney to California , Zionist Jews are spreading venomous hatred against Islam. A few years ago, we were witnessing mere instances and isolated occurrences of Jewish hatred and/or fear of Islam and Muslims. Now, it is very much morbid mass hysteria sustained by rampant and unrelenting incitement and distortion of facts.

In New York , for example, fanatical Zionist Jews don't stop invoking the 9/11 events to generate hatred against Muslims as if Islam and its estimated 1.6 billion followers condoned the diabolical terrorist acts.

In recent weeks, the sick supremacists have been at the forefront of a maliciously racist campaign aimed at inciting local politicians and officials to outlaw the planned construction of a Muslim house of worship in the multi-ethnic, multi-cultural melting-pot city of eight million people.

The Jewish supremacists' message is as hateful as it is brazen: Islam is terror and Muslims are terrorists. This is the same message the Third Reich disseminated against European Jewry prior and during the Second World War.

[To read the entire article, click here.]

Sphere: Related Content

[The Baseline Scenario] Tim Geithner’s Ninth Political Life

Did Tim Geithner receive his appointment as Secretary of the Treasury because he could serve as the culpable goy or because he is Jewish by marriage? In theory treasury undersecretary Stuart Levey works for Geithner but seems to take marching orders from the American Jewish Committee.

Tim Geithner’s Ninth Political Life

By Simon Johnson

In modern American life, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner stands out as amazingly resilient and remarkably lucky – despite presiding over or being deeply involved in a series of political debacles, he has gone from strength to strength.  After at least eight improbably bounce backs, he might seem unassailable.  But his latest mistake – blocking Elizabeth Warren from heading the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – may well prove politically fatal.

Geithner was a junior but key member of the US Treasury team that badly mishandled the early days of the Asian financial crisis in 1997 and received widespread criticism (Life #1).  He was promoted as a result and thereafter enjoyed a meteoric rise.

[To read the entire article, click here.]

Sphere: Related Content

Palestinian Director Muthaffar Recommends Miral

Enas al-Muthaffar's website can be found at http://web.me.com/jerusalemfirstfilms.

Sphere: Related Content

[Menachem Mendel] Rabbinic Haircuts

I am sure that many people reacted with scorn to the “Islamic” haircuts that are now permitted in Iran. Well I have news for you, many rabbis would feel right at home with such a decree. In a text that was appended to the Sifra that listed actions that were prohibited in order that Jews not follow the “Ways of the Nations” (see Lev. 18:3-5), is found the following:

ר’ יהודה בן בתירה או’ שלא תינחור ושלא תגדל ציצית ושלא תספר קמי

R. Judah ben Baterah says: That you should not dress extravagantly (?), and that you should not grow the fringe, and that you should not cut the hair.
(trans. by Beth Berkowitz)

Beth Berkowitz has discussed this source and related ones extensively in her article, “The Limits of “Their Laws”: Ancient Rabbinic Controversies About Jewishness (and Non-Jewishness).” Jewish Quarterly Review 99, 1 (2009): 121-57. Beth suggested that “the irritant for R. Judah ben Baterah is not pagan worship practice but pagan elite cultural practice.”

The other well-known hairstyle from rabbinic literature is the בלורית, which is mentioned in numerous places (see M AZ 1:3; T AZ 3:6; T Shabbat 6 (7):1) The blorit occupied an importantplace in the image of the new Sabra. See this article for some discussion of the word.

Rabbinic discussion of haircuts can be found in most of the major halakhic codes, see e.g. Tur, BY, and ShAr YD 178.

Trying not to blend in too much, and keeping some distance from the majority culture, was no small concern for rabbis.

Sphere: Related Content

Fourfold Campaign Against Islamophobic Prosecutions

The Gesamtkunstwerk

Zionist subversion is a Gesamtkunstwerk (synaesthetic effort). It permeates American society from the 2nd grade in the Boston public schools through the arts, academia, and the highest levels of government.

There is no magic bullet lawsuit that will wipe out the Zionist plague.

Muslim defense organizations must think of fighting Zionism as their own Gesamtkunstwerk that involves lots of little lawsuits, political mobilization, careful investment, and lots of PR. The composition will reach its climax when the first Zionist leaders are incarcerated, but there will still be a lot of work to get to the finale.

Any lesser goal means Muslims will probably lose because Zionists like Pipes are without doubt trying to put as many Muslims in jail as possible.

Ending the political show trials of Muslims is one battle in struggle against Zionism. It is a four track effort:

1. to change the general social political legal atmosphere,
2. to free those unjustly imprisoned,
3. to defend those unjustly accused, and
4. to stop FBI entrapment operations.

Changing the General Atmosphere

Muslim and Arab Americans need to increase public awareness of the web of control that Zionists are trying to exert.

Zionist organizations have targeted rising Muslim and Arab academics for denial of tenure and have tried to prevent any sort of rational education about Arabs and Islam at the secondary level.

If the numerous professionals, who like Joe Massad, Hatem Bazian, Nadia Abu el-Haj, Debbi Almontaser are under Jewish Zionist attack, are willing to band together in a legal proceeding against the conspiracy attempting to prevent them from working, they would probably have the best shot at pursuing a class action law suit to victory.

Because Zionist machinations are hardly confined to the non-governmental sector, Muslim defense organizations must look carefully at the role of Jewish Zionist conspiracy within the federal government.

Jewish Zionists and their lackeys at the IRS have long misused their offices to attempt to deny the granting of 501(c)(3) tax-deductible contribution status to organizations critical of Zionism. For example, the Council for the National Interest, which lobbies for a non-Zionist ME foreign policy, had tremendous difficulty in obtaining 501(c)(3) contribution status while the rabidly Islamophobic Investigative Project of Steven Emerson had no problems whatsoever.

Zionist machinations have enmeshed both Harvard and also Yale as well as probably many other universities in activities and programs like the Harvard Wexner-Israel Fellowship that are problematic under the tax code and other federal regulations.

If the same standards were applied to anti-Arab and anti-Muslim racism as were applied to anti-Black racism in Bob Jones versus USA to strip Bob Jones University of its tax-deductible contribution status, Harvard and probably Yale would have lost their tax-deductible contribution status over two decades ago, but Zionist US government officials and their lackeys can never find the wherewithal to enforce the law as zealously against Zionists as they would against anti-Zionists or non-Jews in general.

Not only is the IRS thoroughly penetrated, but the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Treasury, the DOJ, the Federal Elections Commission (FEC), the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC), and associated US government agencies often make fare greater efforts to undertake the Zionist policies of organizations like the American Jewish Committee (AJC) than those of the US government. Treasury Undersecretary Stuart Levey is a particularly blatant example of a US government official, who acts like an AJC employee on loan to the federal government.

Muslim defense organizations must use the whole range of available legal, regulatory or political means to undermine the Zionist web of control.

The right of rabidly Islamophobic channels like Fox Boston to broadcast spectrum must be challenged. Just as Charles Jacobs and Jewish Zionist groups tried to prevent al-Jazeera's honest reports of the ME from being carried by the Newton cable provider, Muslim groups should run pressure campaigns to drive racist anti-Muslim content-providers like Fox off of every cable network whenever possible.

Muslim defense organizations must file a notice of claim (SF95) to indicate intent to take legal action against any government agency, whose improper or unequal application of US law and regulations is harming Muslim American citizens and residents. Such notice should be accompanied by the identification of US government officials, who like Stuart Levey have incurred Bevins liability through the misuse or perversion of office on behalf Zionism in order to harm Muslims. The Bevins precedent addresses the question of compensating persons, who have suffered torts via unjust deprivation of Constitutional rights.

Freeing those unjustly imprisoned

Because the implications of Bevins precedent belong to the cutting edge of US legal theory, a lawyer using arguments based on Bevins must be ready for close and difficult questioning from judges. Yet Bevins in combination with equal protection arguments (Yick Wo 1886) provides a means to attack the belief

• that far too many judges and jurors have in the government's good faith and
• that has been used so successfully in producing unjust convictions like those of Aref and Hossain in Albany.

While the Supreme Court in theory does not adjust its decisions with political vicissitudes, in practice it does.

With increasing public discussion of Jewish Zionist subversion of the US legal process, an opening may be created for Muslim political prisoners to win appeals against unjust conviction. This outcome would become more likely if Muslim Defense Organizations can link the release to US strategic foreign policy goals and better relations with the Islamic world.

Obviously no Muslim country should trust the US as long as the US wrongfully incarcerates decent patriotic Muslim American citizens.

Defending the unjustly accused

While challenging US government good faith is the key to successful defense in preemptive prosecution cases, some lawyers worry that aggressively throwing rocks at the US government during a trial can backfire on their client. The judge may get angry and increase the sentence in case of conviction. Some judges will retaliate against a defendant during the trial for an aggressive defense campaign against the government.

To win in such a situation, the defense must view themselves not merely as lawyers or as advocates but as the last line of defense for the American way of life. They must act as if they form a highly coordinated special forces unit. Every step of the trial must be carefully choreographed from the jury selection through closing arguments.

During the jury selection, the defense has to look for potential jurors that are less likely to obey an authority perceived as legitimate. In the Aref-Hossain case, Judge McAvoy told the jury that the government had good reason to be suspicious of Aref. He implicitly recommended that the jurors should convict. Such a statement in the mouth of the judge hardly differs from the request of a Milgram's authority figure to raise the electroshock stimulation to harmful or fatal levels.

The defense lawyer must use peremptory challenges to favor jury candidates,

• who come out extremely low on the Milgram authoritarianism profile and
• who would react to such judicial claims by wondering whether there is a good reason to be suspicious of the government.

Because terms like Islamonazi or Islamofascist pervade public discourse and because philo-Semitism highly correlates with Islamophobia, the defense lawyer must use peremptory challenge to exclue any prospective juror

• that believes Muslim groups are prone to Nazion or
• that considers it inflammatory to accuse a Jew of Nazism.

The defense must make every effort to exclude all Jews from the jury except for those that are extremely anti-Zionist.

As soon as possible after the trial starts, the defense team must attack the judicial inclination to defer to the federal government with regard either to issues of foreign policy or to claims of national security.

In 2006 and 2007 creating suspicion of US government duplicity may have been rather difficult, but in 2010 an increasing number of Americans are becoming aware that US ME foreign policy has no connection to US national interest but is created in order to maximize political contributions from hyperwealthy Jewish Zionist subversives like Haim Saban or Sheldon Adelson (or – in Obama's case – from Jewish Zionist subversives like Penny Pritzker or Lester Crown).

While it is understandable that US judges would try to avoid making decisions to harm US national interest, there is no reason for them to help corrupt Democratic and Republican leaders to get their hands on Jewish Zionist money.

The argument may be more relevant to the closing of the trial, but Ii the defense lawyer manages to get this far, he should try to undermine any belief in the righteousness of the US government by emphasizing that if the president has to choose between Saban's or Adelson's political contributions and thousands of Muslim or of American lives, the president, whether Obama or Bush, will not hesitate to sacrifice American citizens of any religion (except perhaps Jews) along with non-citizen Muslims.

The defense team may find it strengthens defense arguments to to differentiate those law enforcement officials truly interested in protecting US security from Zionist lobby agents that have infiltrated the US government on every level and in every branch.

In some sense Muslims are fortunate that Zionist subversives overreached after 9/11 to manipulate Congress into enacting tough anti-terrorist legislation. After the Gaza Rampage and the Flotilla Massacre no one can rationally deny that Israel is a terrorist state and that American supporters of Zionism should be arrested, tried, convicted, and imprisoned for materially aiding Zionist terrorism.

Stopping FBI Entrapment Operations

Herein likes the key to stopping the entrapment operations and political show trials. Once American Jewish Zionist leaders realize that they are vulnerable to terrorism prosecutions, they will suddenly discover a new attachment to the US Constitution and use all their clout to stop terrorism show trials as antithetical to fundamental Constitutional principles.

If Muslim organizations can persuade foreign governments like Turkey to demand the prosecution of Zionist terrorism supporters in the USA, the non-Jewish non-Zionist segment of the US foreign policy establishment may use what little remains of its political clout to work to stop FBI stings and the Islamophobic show trials.

The Caveat

One attorney, who volunteered to aid the victims of Zionist-orchestrated show trials, has a major reservation about the about the above legal strategy.

“It is impossible to mount a defense that the prosecution was generated through improper influences without proof that this is so. As defense lawyers we may feel that improper influences are behind a prosecution but the judge will not allow speculation about it. It requires proof, and given the nature of the challenge it would be very very difficult, expensive and costly for an individual lawyer in an individual case to make any headway in obtain such proof for an individual case. What is really needed is some money and effort to be spent uncovering all of the hidden influences that are working on our prosecution system right now which could be used in all preemptive prosecution cases. Who has enough money and time right now to do it?”

Unless Muslim and American civil liberties defense organizations start working double time to raise money to defend the American constitutional system and to put as many Zionists in jail as possible, the American way of life will be lost as the USA becomes a slave state where non-Jews and non-Zionists languish under the whip of Zionist masters.

Sphere: Related Content

Reframing Post-9/11 Islamophobic Frame-Ups

Since 9/11 the US government has been avidly recreating Yale Professor Stanley Milgram's studies of authoritarianism. The renowned social psychologist demonstrated that an overwhelming majority of people in a properly contrived situation would commit atrocities, i.e, administer harmful or fatal electroshocks, under the command of an authority figure perceived as legitimate. Even though Milgram's research proved not to be useful in entrapment defense, it has strong relevance to the plethora of show trials that the FBI and the DOJ have produced to pleasure of Zionists and to the disgust of those concerned with civil liberties and with the rule of law. 

In the past prosecutors neutralized Milgram's analysis by claiming there was a world of difference between Milgram's legitimate authority scenario and a sting in which a government agent poses as a would-be criminal in order to persuade criminally-minded individuals to take part in a conspiracy to break the law.

The prosecutors' argument is less effective when the government agent poses as respectable businessman or religious authority,

• who is seeking aid from fellow Muslims for an operation to transfer weapons to Lashkar-i-Tayyiba to battle the Indian military, which oppresses Kashmiri Muslims or
• who wants to mount an attack on a synagogue whose members are providing material support to the Zionist state, which routinely commits terrorist acts like the Gaza Rampage or the Flotilla Massacre.

While the application of Milgram's work is helpful to understanding the dynamics of Islamophobic sting operations, the Islamophobic courtroom drama much more faithfully reproduces the Milgram experiments, for the US government in the person of prosecutors, FBI agents, and other government officials posing as legitimate authorities persuade the judge and the jury to commit legal atrocities that destroy good and decent men and women as well as their families. 

Such manipulation is particularly easy for three reasons:

1. American judges tend to defer to the government in matters of foreign policy,
2. Americans generally believe that the US government pursues a rational foreign policy in the best interests of the USA, and
3. far too many Americans believe that US is blameless in its dealings with Arab and Muslim states or people.

As a result, judges tend to accept US attorney assertions related to national security while Arab and Muslim defendants face a jury already with two strikes against them in the minds of the jurors.

 Thus in Islamophobic show trials prosecutors and the US government are well-positioned to commit great wrongs and to undermine the constitutional legal system of the USA as happened in the earliest cases like that of Hemant Lakhani and as has consistently taken place in more recent trials like the Aref-Hossain case.

To win in such a situation, the defendants' legal team must view itself not merely as a group of collaborating lawyers or as advocates but as the last line of defense for the American way of life. The attorneys for the accused must act as if they belong to highly coordinated special forces unit. Every step of the trial must be carefully choreographed from the jury selection through closing arguments.

During the jury selection, the defense has to look for potential jurors that are less likely to obey an authority perceived as legitimate. In the Aref case, Judge McAvoy told the jury that the government had good reason to be suspicious of Aref. He implicitly recommended that the jurors should convict. Such a statement in the mouth of the judge hardly differs from the request of Milgram's authority figure to raise the electroshock stimulation to harmful or fatal levels.

The defense lawyer must use peremptory challenges to favor jury candidates, who come out extremely low on the Milgram authoritarianism profile and who would react to such judicial claims by wondering whether there is a good reason to be suspicious of the government.

Because of post-9/11 atmosphere where terms like Islamonazi or Islamofascist pervade political discourse, the defense lawyer must ask the prospective juror whether he believe Muslims could be Nazis and whether he believe it was inflammatory to accuse a Jew of Nazism. If philo-Semitism is the front side of a coin, Islamophobia is the reverse.

The defense must make every effort to exclude any Jews from jury except for those that are extremely anti-Zionist.

As soon as possible after the trial starts, the defense team must attack the inclination to foreign policy deference and claims of national security. In 2006 and 2007 the argument may have been more difficult, but in 2010 an increasing number of Americans are becoming aware that US ME foreign policy has no connection to US national interest but is created in order to maximize political contributions from hyperwealthy Jewish Zionists like Haim Saban or Sheldon Adelson (or in the case of Obama from Penny Pritzker and Lester Crown).

While it is understandable that US judges would try to avoid making decisions to harm US national interest, there is no reason for them to help Democratic and Republican leaders to get their hands on Jewish Zionist money. 

The argument may be more relevant to the closing of the trial, but If the defense lawyer manages to get this far, he should try to undermine any belief in the righteousness of the US government by emphasizing that if the president has to choose between Saban's or Adelson's political contributions and thousands of Muslim or of American lives, the president, whether Obama or Bush, will not hesitate to sacrifice American citizens of any religion (except perhaps Jews) along with non-citizen Muslims. 

If the defense can manage it, it might try to look at the connections between the trial participants and high ranking Jewish Zionist government officials. In the Aref-Hossain case these links may have been particularly important because Shamshad Ahmad, Ph.D., reported in his personal account of the proceedings (Rounded Up, Artificial Terrorists and Muslim Entrapment after 9/11) that the highest levels in the White House were following the trial. 

Here is a link chart of an important portion of the web of corrupt Zionist influence:

Daniel Pipes, Steven Emerson, and Charles Jacobs are three prominent American Jewish Zionist Islamophobes. Jacobs and Pipes often work together while Jacobs hired Emerson and his Investigative Project organization to fabricate evidence against the Islamic Society of Boston when the David Project tried to halt construction of the Roxbury Mosque. 

In an act of pure cynicism or perhaps as a sick joke, George W. Bush appointed Daniel Pipes as a director of the US National Institute of Peace. Jewish Zionists Stuart Levey, Jonathan Schanzer, and Matthew Levitt all worked at the upper levels of the Treasury Department in theory to stop terrorist cash flows but in reality to staunch the increasing political clout of wealthy Muslims and Muslim countries. Stuart Levey has continued in the same role under the Obama administration.

Jewish Zionist Evan Kohlmann, who seems to have become acquainted with Matthew Levitt while they worked on FBI terrorism projects, served as a prosecution expert witness during the Aref-Hossain trial and many other Islamophobic political prosecutions.

As Dr. Ahmad points out, Kohlmann spoke none of the languages in Bangla-Desh, Pakistan, or Iraq and was completely clueless with regard to the politics. He seems to have regurgitated a theory that Schanzer and Levitt had put together to justify the attack on Iraq. These two Jewish racists fantasized an impossible collaboration between the Islamic Movement for Kurdistan, Ansar al-Islam, al-Qaeda, and Saddam Hussain. Within the framework of this ridiculous idea, Jewish Neocons could argue that Aref-Hossain sting operation demonstrated the existence of a combined Saddam Hussein al-Qaeda threat within the borders of the continental USA.

When Judge McAvoy prevented Aref's and Hossain's attorneys from challenging Kohlmann's credentials, the defense should have aggressively concentrated on Kohlmann's agenda.

Now that the Department of Homeland Security, unlike the FBI, has ceased to collaborate with the ADL because of this Jewish organization's obvious ethnopolitical agenda, there is no reason for the defense to be diffident about discussing the ethnopolitical agenda of Jewish Zionist officials or expert witnesses like Kohlmann or Levitt (in the Holy Land Foundation trial).

After introducing the Jewish Zionist subtext of the Islamophobic show trials, the defense can address issues relating to the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution and the 1886 Yick Wo precedent, in which the Supreme Court ruled that it was just as unconstitutional to enforce federal law in a discriminatory way as it was for a law to be discriminatory.

After the Gaza Rampage and the Flotilla Massacre, no one rational can doubt that Israel is a terrorist state and that Jewish Zionists provide material support for terrorism. Yet the Federal government has yet to arrest one Jewish Zionist on terrorism charges.

During summation, after having completely delegitimized the authority of the FBI and the Department of Justice because of deep penetration Jewish Zionist subversion, the defense should ask the jurors whether they will act as the stooges of a cabal that sacrifices American blood and treasure "because it is good for the Jews."

In conclusion the defense should demand that the jury find the accused innocent for the good of the USA.

If this strategy proves effective, it could enter mainstream politics as a demand that US laws be enforced uniformly for Jews and non-Jews. If it gets traction internationally, foreign governments like Pakistan pressured by the US government to suppress Islamist groups might be motivated to demand reciprocal crack-downs on American Jewish Zionist groups. At that point Zionists inside and outside of government will have lost any shred of legitimate authority in Milgram's sense. As a result grass roots national and international political activists might have a shot at convincing (non-Jewish non-Zionist) US foreign policy makers that the US will only be able to keep any moral standing on human rights issues if the president pardons all the Muslim political prisoners incarcerated after Islamophobic political show trials and then apologizes to the Islamic world for participating in Zionist crimes for the last 63 years. 

Arresting, trying, convicting and incarcerating leading Zionists (like Haim Saban, Sheldon Adelson, Penny Pritzker, Lester Crown, the Bronfmans, Martin Peretz, Stuart Levey, Matthew Levitt, Charles Jacobs, et al.) for materially aiding Zionist terrorism, Conspiracy Against Rights, and Seditious Conspiracy would help restore American credibility.

Sphere: Related Content