Jewish Peril 1933 Versus 2009

[This blog entry is a draft, and I will add more references and links over the next few days.]

Obama's April 24th Holocaust Days of Remembrance speech at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum and the recent May 3rd-5th AIPAC Conference indicates the importance of the role that generally distorted perceptions of the events of the 20s, 30s, and 40s play in contemporary US politics.

Recap of 2009 AIPAC Policy Conference

Speakers at the AIPAC conference completely ignored the historical context of WW2 as they made repeated references to the Holocaust, Hitler, Nazis, gas chambers, transports, and concentration or death camps.

Even though my senator John Kerry took part in the gathering along with at least half of Congress and made his own ridiculous primordialist contribution to the general butchering of history, my local paper, the Boston Globe, did not even cover the conference at all.

Obama's Speech at the U S Holocaust Museum

Not only does Obama mischaracterize 1930s Germany in his Holocaust speech, but

• with the ongoing use by the Obama administration of predator technology to create havoc and death in Pakistan,
• after the slaughter and population dislocation caused by George W. Bush administration policies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Palestine, Pakistan, and the Sudan,
• after the massively infanticidal sanctions regime continued by the Clinton administration against Iraq,
• after the mass-killing of the Gulf War of George H. W. Bush, and
• after decades of support for the transplanted E. European brutality, oppression and murderousness of the Zionist state,

Obama could easily have been describing the recent history of the USA in his introductory paragraphs except for the explicit reference to the Holocaust:

It is the grimmest of ironies that one of the most savage, barbaric acts of evil in history began in one of the most modernized societies of its time, where so many markers of human progress became tools of human depravity: science that can heal, used to kill; education that can enlighten, used to rationalize away basic moral impulses; the bureaucracy that sustains modern life, used as the machinery of mass death, a ruthless, chillingly efficient system where many were responsible for the killing, but few got actual blood on their hands.

While the uniqueness of the Holocaust in scope and in method is truly astounding, the Holocaust was driven by many of the same forces that have fueled atrocities throughout history: the scapegoating that leads to hatred and blinds us to our common humanity; the justifications that replace conscience and allow cruelty to spread; the willingness of those who are neither perpetrators nor victims to accept the assigned role of bystander, believing the lie that good people are ever powerless or alone, the fiction that we do not have a choice.

It absolves the US government and far too many Jews of vast crimes to describe the events of the Holocaust as "horrors that defy comprehension."

Someone with genuine knowledge of Jewish history since the 1850s and Russian Communist history from the pre-Revolutionary period through the start of WW2 would be lying to state:

While the uniqueness of the Holocaust in scope and in method is truly astounding, the Holocaust was driven by many of the same forces that have fueled atrocities throughout history: the scapegoating that leads to hatred and blinds us to our common humanity; the justifications that replace conscience and allow cruelty to spread; the willingness of those who are neither perpetrators nor victims to accept the assigned role of bystander, believing the lie that good people are ever powerless or alone, the fiction that we do not have a choice.

The Holocaust was a result of the Jewish peril, which was as real in 1933 as the German threat was in 1939 and which cannot simply be dismissed because the phrase was used in the title of an English translation of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The popularity of this fabrication did not result from irrational anti-Semitism that has existed since time immemorial, but from a growing awareness that a founding population of modern Europe appeared collectively to have chosen an extremely threatening political direction.

Even though Winston Churchill did not have complete comprehension of E. European Jewish history, reading his opinion in the 1920 article below can help explain important aspects of the anti-Semitism that developed in Central and E. Europe during the 1920s and 1930s.

ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, February 8, 1920

Zionism versus Bolshevism.

A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Terrorist Jews

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

While Alsatian and German Jews generally supported the French revolution, their "recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution" via manufacturing and provisioning is not obviously much greater than that of their gentile competitors.

Churchill underestimates the role of Jewish women in revolutionary violence. On p. 650 of Fire in the Minds of Men, Origins of the Reolutionary Faith, James Billington writes:

Important new research by L. Gerson for a biography of Dzerzhinsky indicates that the first love of that Polish-Russian founder of the Soviet secret police was Julia Goldman, the Jewish sister of a founder of the Bund. Jewish women continued to play a disproportionately great role in those aspects of revolutionary activity that required dedication and risk. almost 30 percent of the women terrorists in the SR Party were Jewish, though very few Jewish men were involved (Knight, 146).

E. European ethnic Ashkenazi disaffection with the Czarist government resulted neither from racial persecution nor from oppression nor from relative poverty even though by Western European standards the Russian Empire was severely economically underdeveloped.

The misguided reforms of Czar Nicholas I threatened Jewish economic security, but they ended with his death in 1855.

Not only did the Jewish policy of Nicholas I impel Russian Jews into criminality like smuggling, kidnapping, prostitution, and white slaving from the 1830s onward, but from the early 1850s they also become highly involved in sabotage, revolutionary violence, and targeted assassinations.

Although pogroms break out against Jews after Czar Alexander II's assassination, in which Russian Jewish women played the leading role, Jews continued to develop increasing wealth and to advance socially in the Empire although not as fast as they would have liked.

Despite such achievements Jewish disaffection continued and even grew possibly because Czarist law generally excluded Jews from serving within the government bureaucracy. By the 1890s they had become even more prominent in revolutionary leadership and violence.

When the Russian Revolution broke out, Russian ethnic Ashkenazim were at the forefront of the Red Army and mass killing. Later during the consolidation of the Soviet state, they predominated in the secret police, tended to be executioners, and planned or managed most of the Soviet ethnic cleansing or genocide long before the German Nazis started to kill Jews en mass in 1941.

Because Jews and especially ethnic Ashkenazim were a transnational group with transnational politics, Jewish criminality, revolutionary violence, and subversion spread throughout E. Europe to most of the rest of Europe and to the Americas while the Zionist use or targeted assassinations against Palestinians during the 1930s hardly seems like an independent development.

Although the German Nazis took power in 1933 after a campaign in which the NSDAP was careful not to run as an anti-Semitic party, vast numbers of non-Jews throughout Europe and the Americas feared and hated Jews.

Lots of governments in Europe at the time were racist or authoritarian including those of the UK and France while the US government oppressed African Americans in ways not unlike the abuse native populations received in Latin America and Australia.

When one realizes that the German Nazis burned books while the Soviets were executing authors, the German Nazis seem neither insane nor exceptionally evil by 1930s standards.

Although the German government moved quickly to remove Jews from the government, from academia, and from critical positions in the finance industry, the relatively small population of German Jews initially was not the major concern of Hitler's regime, which was far more focused on restoring the economy, on creating a positive sense of German ethnic consciousness, and on correcting perceived injustices in the international political order.

Because many German Nazis shared Churchill's opinion that Zionism provided a cure for Jewish anti-social behavior, the German Nazis fairly quickly reached out to Zionists in part to thwart threats of a boycott but also because of genuine belief that Zionists and German Nazis were on the same völkisch racist wavelength.

Nazi Journal Der Angriff struck the above medal to commemorate fact-finding trip to Palestine.

Anti-Semitic thought in Nazi Germany was complex in ways that modern Americans (and Germans) generally fail to understand.

Many German Nazis genuinely believed that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion represented truth even though its thesis of an overarching Jewish conspiracy was nonsense. Few non-Jews during the first half of the twentieth understood the degree to which Yiddish politics like that of Russians and Poles was multiconspiratorial.

Many German Nazis believed correctly that a lot of Jews were involved in manipulation of the financial system and competed unfairly, but the hostility was not expressed only on völkisch racial grounds, for the German Nazis often treated the German aristocratic collaborators with German Geldjuden (money Jews) with as much contempt and hostility as they treated Jews.

Many German Nazis believed that there had been a Jewish Dolchstoß (stab-in-the-back) that caused German defeat in WW1. Some German Nazis probably confused legends of betrayal of the military effort with real post-WW1 backstabbing to drive the Ostdeutsch population out of the economies of the new Slavic states that had been carved out of the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires, but others put German Zionists into a special category of völkisch Jews that would not act so dishonorably. In reality, German Zionists were more likely to have betrayed Germany than any other Jewish group within the German Empire. (See In Re: Partition Still Casts Shadow On India-Pakistan Ties.)

While on the whole German Nazis wanted to remove the Jews from Germany as much as Zionists haved wished that Palestinians would simply vanish, Walter Rinderle and Bernard Norling even note in The Nazi Impact on a German Village[364] (p. 135) that:

[until] 1938 Jewish families in Lahr county [Germany] believed themselves to be well-integrated into their communities. In Lahr city they received permission to form an NSDAP "Party of Jewish Youth" in 1935, and in Offenburg Jewish founded their own group of patriotic War Veterans.

While Kristallnacht represented a completely different approach to German Jews by another faction of German Nazis, all German Nazis could argue that the unwillingness of other countries to give asylum to the passengers of the S.S. St. Louis in 1939 validated both German Nazi and Zionist ideological positions.

Today Jewish Zionists shamelessly use this story, on which the movie Voyage of the Damned is based, in order to guilt trip Americans and other non-Jews into silence about Zionist atrocities

• even though all the passengers eventually did find refuge and
• even though by any objective standards the violence and atrocities of far too many Jews had rendered all Jews undesirable immigrants especially
  • in countries still suffering from the depression and
  • in Arab states willing to admit Jews as long as Zionists renounced the effort to steal Palestine from the native population.

Shortly after the SS St. Louis debacle reached its ending, the German government in a brilliant diplomatic maneuver concluded the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Treaty on August 23, 1939 and then invaded Poland on September 1, 1939 in an act which is usually interpreted today as unadulterated aggression and malevolence but which at the time could have been viewed as an effort to reclaim historically German territories.

During the Sitzkrieg of 1939-40 and then after Blitzkrieg of 1940, the German government expected the British government to recognize the new geostrategic reality of German domination of continental Europe and even hoped that the UK would join Germany in an anti-Soviet alliance.

The German government blamed the failure to achieve this result on the constant anti-German and anti-Nazi ideological barrage of the US and UK press. Because German Nazi ideology trapped German Nazis in their own ideological anti-Semitism, they saw a non-existent transnational Judeobolshevik conspiracy that was preparing to muster total war against Germany under the orchestration of the Judeobolshevik rulers of the USSR and Soviet Jewish agents within the Jewish communities of the USA and the UK.

Analysis of the articles of communist and communist-leaning Jewish reporters and columnists in the American and British press during this time period shows fairly general confusion while Zionist-inclined reporters rejected any sort of settlement or compromise. These latter journalists may have reflected

• the impatience of the Zionist leadership with the unwillingness of Jews to leave Europe to join the Jewish settlement and
• the Zionist hope that increased hostilities in Europe might create conditions to drive European Jews to Palestine.

Because of his perception of the impending Judeobolshevik threat , Hitler concluded that he had no choice but to attack first in June 1941 under the Code Name Unternehmen Barbarossa.

The invasion of the Soviet Union changed the dynamic of German Nazi Jewish policy. For the first time the German government encountered populations willing without incitement to slaughter Jews en mass because of fear or anger at Soviet Jewish outrages since the Russian Revolution. In effect Eastern European Jews were subjected to separate German and non-German mass-killing efforts that should probably be divided into two separate Holocausts despite the somewhat inaccurate labeling of non-Jewish killers in Eastern European and Soviet territories as merely hilfswillige (willing to help).

Before 1939 only three of Hitler's speeches directly addressed the Jewish question. After the start of the war with the Soviet Union and especially after the German advance bogs down, Nazi propaganda began to emphasize Judeobolshevik threat, menace and terror.

By 1942 the exterminationist faction of the German Nazi party had taken control of Jewish policy. After some experimentation with the use of German euthanasia technology in December 1941, a subset of concentration camps in E. Europe began to implement mass killing.

Raul Hiberg's 5.1 million figure for total Jewish fatalities during the Holocaust is probably best, but he probably overestimates by at least 1 million

• because many Jews simply changed their nationality as Soviet borders were moved westward after the defeat of Nazi German and
• because he includes many Jews that died just like non-Jews of harsh conditions associated with the war.

Of the more accurate maximum of 4 million Jewish deaths due to mass killing, at least half represented independent revenge or fear killings of Jews by Hilfswilligen.

Einsatzgruppen and Wehrmacht units killed about half of the remaining Jews although very often as Soviet officials or as Soviet soldiers, among whom Russian Jews were disproportionately represented. At most 2 million Jews were sent to E. European concentration camps, where well over half died because of the toxic environment and not through assembly-line killing apparatus.

While both the German and non-German Holocaust of Jews during WW2 are evil, not only is the German brutality hardly exceptional by the standard of British actions during the Boer War or of American treatment of the resistance during the pacification of the Philippines, but German Nazi atrocities pale by comparison both relatively and absolutely with Jewish involvement in mass killing, ethnic cleansing, and genocide from the Russian Revolution through the incineration of Arab and Muslim countries during the George W. Bush administration under the direction of Zionist Neocons acting as a Jewish special interest.

The transformation of the events of the Holocaust into "horrors that defy comprehension" results from several factors.

1. Without the identification of German Nazis as absolute evil, many people might have realized that WW2 was unnecessary and that tens of millions had died for nothing. The British and the French or the British alone after the defeat of France should probably have negotiated some form of comprehensive settlement between the end of 1939 and June 1941. Peace in Europe would probably have changed both Japanese and American calculations to render a Pacific War far less likely.

An alternate history without WW2 would have conceded dominance to German Nazi ethnic cleansers in continental Europe and left a somewhat repressive Japanese sphere of influence in E. Asia, but Americans and Western Europeans can hardly quibble about such an outcome, for not only have they supported Jewish ethnic cleansers and genocidaires in Stolen and Occupied Palestine for over 60 years, but an E. Asia without the Pacific War probably would not have suffered the Korean and Vietnamese Wars.

2. Making German Nazism the personification of evil and subjecting Germans to victor's justice after their defeat distracted from numerous Allied war crimes and crimes against humanity.

3. Solely blaming Germans for WW2 killings of Jews avoided messy questions about "captive nations" during the Cold War.

4. Making Jews pure victims benefited Jews in numerous way.

• After the Holocaust and WW2 no one really had the stomach to look into the Jewish ethnic aspect of the 1929 Crash and the Great Depression, and discussion of Jewish Zionist manipulation of the US economy and politics since the 1950s is considered indicative of the recrudescence of the German Nazi anti-Semitic mentality.
  
• Jewish communist subversion and espionage became a delicate question in the USA.
• Discussion of the disproportionate role of Jewish communists in E. Germany, Poland, Czechoslavakia, Hungary, and Yugoslavia during the immediate aftermath of WW2 is effectively off limits even though such an outcome had been the major fear of the peoples of those countries during the inter bellum period.
• Jewish Zionists have been able to justify the theft of Palestine as just amends for a false mythological history of 2000 years of persecution.
• A Zionist mythological understanding of WW2 has become the core of a Holocaust religious cult,
  
  • whose primary shrine and monument is the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington,
    
  • whose secondary shrine and monument is Yad Vashem in Jeruslem,
    
  • which justifies the possession of the atomic bomb by extremist Jewish Zionist ethnic cleansers and genocidaires, and
    
  • which periodically demands the sacrifice of an Arab or Muslim country or leader as a burnt offering substituting for Nazi Germany or Adolf Hitler.

Not only have Jewish Zionists become the masters of worldwide genocide discourse, but the apotheosis of the Holocaust in American politics without a doubt portends world historical disaster.

Marxism, Zionism, and more recently Friedmanism, which has reformulated the economics of the Polish arenda system for the modern global economy, have all served as vehicles for rapacious, avaricious, and blood-thirsty Jewish political or political-economic elites to make a grab for global political-economic dominance.

Despite the anti-Semitic mythology of the early 20th century, Soviet Marxist Jews generally rejected collaboration with Zionists or the Jewish economic elite except under very special circumstances. In contrast Friedmanites and Neocon Zionists have combined since the Reagan administration in a power configuration that is properly described as the Zionist Imperial System.

The trajectory of growing Zionist domination is unmistakable in the combination of

• propagandistic academic misrepresentation of Zionism, Jewish history, Arab history, and the Islamic world since the beginning of the Zionist movement,
  
• increasing financial and content manipulation of the US media and entertainment industries since the 50s, 60s, and 70s,
• Zionist creation of a world class military and nuclear weapons technology during the 50s, 60s,
• a long term project apparently dating from the 1967 War to pervert international legal discourse to render Zionist ethnic cleansing and colonization irreversible under international law,
• philanthropic manipulation of African Americans,
  
• a long term project to control the discourse about the Holocaust and anti-Semitism with criminalization of expression unacceptable to Zionists,
  
• the Zionist Neocon practice confrontation with the Soviet Union over the Refusenik Movement,
• the diversion of US national resources to thwart third world developmentalist strategies with concomitant conversion of third-world wealth into revenue streams mostly owned or controlled by the Eastern European Yiddish, mostly Jabotinskian "New Crowd" on Wall Street,
• the post-Carter development of a workable strategy to transform the USA, European nations and former European settler colonies into intimidated and dependent client states of the Zionist Virtual Colonial motherland,
• a long term project to incite Islamophobia, to marginalize Western Muslims, to create a hegemonic human rights or regenderization discourse delegitimizing Islam, and to criminalize any charitable support of Palestinians,
• Jabotinskian Zionist ethno-national financial warfare, which started in the 1980s, which continues to this day, and which has resulted in the worldwide financial meltdown,
  
• hollowing out and weakening of governments throughout the world in conformance with Friedmanite neo-arenda economics,
  
• Zionist instigated US incineration of Arab and Muslim countries, which continues right before our eyes in Pakistan, and
• ongoing Zionist incitement of US-Iran confrontation that benefits only Zionists.

Comparing Zionist and German Nazi ideology shows that both political intellectual systems consist of a practically identical combination (with obvious ethnic substitutions) of politicized ethnic fundamentalism, extremist organic nationalism, social Darwinism, biological determinism, essentialism, primordialism, perverted eugenic theory, opposition to race mixing for causing ethnic degeneration, and the corresponding belief in national revival through racial purity.

Yet Zionists have proven to be much smarter Nazis for they have built their thousand year Reich as a virtual state entity and have piggy-backed on US power and influence since 1947 in an effort to conquer not merely territory but to thoroughly colonize the minds of their Western victims, who are being lead like sheep to some sort of apocalyptic slaughter in confrontation with the Islamic world.

In comparison with the Jewish Zionist peril of 2009, the real albeit anti-Semitically tainted Jewish peril of the 20s and 30s, the German Nazi threat during the 30s, and the post-WW2 Communist Menace all fade into insignificance.

Sphere: Related Content