Petroleum: Driving Force in Zionism

It's Always Been About Oil

by Joachim Martillo (ThorsProvoni@aol.com)

Zionists and oil have been a major headline topic from [WSJ] Perle Linked to Kurdish Oil Plan* at the end of July to the Russian intervention in the formally (or formerly) Georgian regions South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Many commentators like the Jewish Zionist Neocon Krauthammer have discussed Russian desire to control the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Of course, such analysts refrain from mentioning the equally strong intent of Zionists to gain control of oil resources throughout the world in order to profit from them. In addition, the Zionist intelligentsia views private corporate ownership as the means to guarantee that Arab or Muslim governments cannot ever use the oil weapon against Israel as happened in 1973.**

In general, the Kremlin has no tolerance for competing power centers within the Russian Federation or within the Russian sphere of influence as the experience of Russian Jewish oligarch Khodorkovski has shown. Surprise on the part of American foreign policy makers can only be attributed to incompetence because the period leading up to the attack on Georgia has been characterized by a surfeit of warning signs from Russia including (without limitation):

• support for Serbia during the Clinton administration,
• support for Abkhazian and South Ossetian separatism in Georgia,
• crushing Chechen separatists,
• support for pro-Russian political parties in the Ukraine,
• intimidation of the Ukraine over natural gas requirements,
• attempts to arrest other Russian Jewish oligarchs,
• stalling over Iranian nuclear ambitions,resistance to the expansion of NATO,
• opposition to the US attack on Iraq,
• opposition to using sites within Poland and the Czech Republic for missile defense shield technology, and
• rejection of independence for Kosovo.

The Russian government is almost certainly unhappy with the expansion of Zionist Jewish philanthropic politics and manipulation throughout the former Soviet Union.

While Russia has at least some influence over Ukrainian politics, Zionists have developed close relations with both the Saakashvili regime and the originally Jewish oligarch-led opposition with the result of effectively excluding the Russians.

When the USA showed weakness in its confrontation with Iran, the temptation for the Russian Federation to act must have been irresistible in the face of increasing Georgian provocation.

Not only is the Jewish Zionist involvement in the oil politics of the Caucasus nothing new, but it even dates from the earliest period in the development of Zionism.

Shortly after the discovery of petroleum in the region of the Baku in 1879, the French Rothschilds began to invest in Czarist Russia with the hope of exploiting the oil resources. The targeted assassination of Czar Alexander II by a Jewish led terrorist organization created an anti-Jewish reaction that threatened Rothschild goals and that provided an incentive for the development of Zionist politics among Russian Jews.

The French Rothschilds in the 1880s do not seem to have been much interested in Zionism per se, and they probably could not really distinguish one form of Russian Jewish radical politics from another, but creating or supporting Jewish colonies in Palestine could easily have appeared to the Rothschild family as a sort of pressure release valve that could prove to the Czarist government the benefits of working with the French Rothschilds to develop an oil industry.

By the late 1890s explorers had found evidence of sizable oil deposits in Ottoman Mesopotamia. D'Arcy Exploration (later Anglo-Iranian Oil Co.) discovered commercial oil in 1908 at Masjid-i-Suleiman in Iran. During the same time period, Herzl had developed the Dreyfus case as a gimmick to market Zionism by scare-mongering the possibility of pogroms in Western Europe.

Probably inspired by fear and self-interest the British Rothschilds put their financial resources into the service of Zionism just as they were investing in Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Because Russian Jews were already heavily involved in the Russian oil service industry thanks to French Rothschild investments, the British Rothschilds could even justify their efforts on behalf of Zionism as a way to bring useful personnel to the ME to work in a ME oil industry.

Because the Ottoman Empire was an impediment both to Zionism and to full exploitation of Middle Eastern oil by the UK, it had to go -- at least in the minds of Zionist leaders, who made a lot of money available to British politicians of the same opinion during the period leading to WWI. These political investments culminated in the Balfour declaration and in the vivisection of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of WWI despite the worries of the British foreign office about the geostrategic implications and the effect among British imperial Muslim subjects.***

Even though a significant number of the British government officials opposed Zionism right from the start, they never hindered Zionist efforts to any great extent. British Zionist leader Herbert Samuel became the first High Commissioner to Mandatory Palestine, and the Haifa-Mosul pipeline was put into operation in 1931.

The marriage of the Eastern European Zionist intelligentsia to Western European Jewish plutocracy within the realm of late 19th and early 20th century oil politics forms the original and continuing basis of the Zionist imperial system, whose virtual colonial motherland I call Judonia.

The Judonian lust to control Caucasian, Middle Eastern and world oil supplies has grown ever stronger in the almost century since the Balfour Declaration was addressed to Walter Rothschild and has colored Bush administration Neocon-inspired policies toward the ME, Venezuela, and the territories of the former Soviet Union.

Modern international politics is only comprehensible with a thorough understanding of the relationship between petroleum and Judonia as long as care is taken to distinguish between Judonia and Jews.

Ever since Zionist Jewish oligarchs took control of Jewish education throughout the world, far too many Jews confuse the interests of ordinary Jews and those of Judonia, but Judonia serves only the Zionist Jewish oligarchy and intelligentsia. For Judonia ordinary Jews are simply a resource and nothing more.

NOTES

* According to the WSJ article Perle negotiated this deal with the help of Aydan Kodaloglu, who has long been a Zionist shill within Turkey.

Like Father like Sun discloses the following information:

Alleged journalist Claudia Rosett hits the ground of SethAndIranistan running, readily adapting to the Sun practice of ignoring empirical reality in favor of preferred narrative. She likewise proves herself proficient in omitting rather crucial details when introducing sources. Rosett on the "Muslim world":

Reports yesterday from places such as Syria and Egypt, as well as Iraq itself, quoted men-in-the-street as both stunned and contemptuous that Saddam, though armed with a pistol in his hole, surrendered without a shot. "He's such a coward, the way he was captured today," says Turkish businesswoman Aydan Kodaloglu, reached by phone in Ankara. "Every fundamentalist in the Muslim world is going to be thinking of this picture," added Ms. Kodaloglu, referring to the TV footage of a compliant, disheveled Saddam, opening his mouth wide for a flashlight and tongue depressor, and bowing his head while a doctor checked for lice.

Businesswoman? American Enterprise stooge? "An Ankara political consultant active in promoting Israel-Turkey relations" (as reported by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency - a "venerable" and "highly credible wire" as SethAndIra told us last month - on November 20, 2002)? Rosett is of course not fooling her readers - simply because nobody reads the atrocious Sun.

With "journalists" as thick-headed and oblivious to the story featuring so prominently in the paper's pages, there's no real reason to bother. Rosett's 700-page gloat plays up the fact that the once mighty Saddam reduced to the figure of a "bedraggled fugitive cowering facedown with his gun in a hole in the ground" will serve as a potent "symbol of defeat" for "terrorists," by which she means Muslims. Of immediate note to anyone at all paying attention, one wonders how this pathetic cowering tyrant was able to orchestrate the loyalists and foreign terrorists that comprise the Iraqi resistance in the Sun's telling literally from a hole in the ground. Ms. Rosett chooses not to trouble herself with so obvious a question.

** The Israel Lobby and American Society points out:

When the Arab oil producers reacted [to US policy of support for Israel during the 1973 war] by imposing an embargo, the Kristols and their fellow Neocons, responded by discovering that "US security interests" required Friedmanist privatization of Arab oil companies so that they would be run solely for profit with no possible future use as a political weapon. No other rational interpretation of Greenspan: Ouster Of Hussein Crucial For Oil Security[401] is possible because some future ruler of Iraq could easily be even worse than Saddam Hussein by whatever criteria are current at that time. In this sense, the Second Iraq War probably was all about the political threat oil represents to Israel and not about any compelling American security requirement except in the minds of those that cannot distinguish American and Israeli interests.

[EAAZI] Zionist Control: Sovereign Wealth Funds? discusses Zionist panic at the power of oil-money based sovereign wealth funds.

*** Their anger became the basis of the Khilifat Movement in India and much of Islamist rage at the West today.

Sphere: Related Content