Help Fight Judonia!

Please help sustain EAAZI in the battle against Jewish Zionist transnational political economic manipulation and corruption.

For more info click here or here!

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Zionist Film: Genocide Denial, Genocide Incitement, Casus Belli

The intellectually dishonest SaveDarfur campaign, which originated with the David Project, the American Jewish World Service, and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, has worked since 2004 to condition the US public on the model of Pavlov's dogs with the belief that genocide is a crime so horrible that the US must must "do whatever it takes" to prevent the possibility of its occurrence anywhere.

As part of this campaign the organized Jewish community makes strenuous efforts to establish itself as the arbiteur of genocide so that only it will have the right to ring Pavlov's "genocide bell" so to speak to cause the US government and military to take reflexive action.

Just as Jewish "anti-genocide" organzations have used false accusations of genocide to push Darfur divestment through a number of state legislatures, Neocons and other US war-mongers like the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) argue for an attack on Iran.

According to the perverted and racist reasoning of Neocons, Zionists, Israel advocacy groups, and Jewish communal organizations, Ahmedinejad's questioning of some of the common wisdom about the mass murder of Jews during WW2 makes him a Holocaust denier even though many common beliefs about the Holocaust are in fact untrue.

On the basis of the false equation of doubt and denial, B'nai Brith of Canada, which is yet another psychotic warmongering Jewish communal organization, charges Ahmadinejad with genocide incitement (http://www.bnaibrith.ca/institute/IndictmentOfIranianPresident-Specifics.html#s1) because genocide denial (specifically Holocaust denial) is according to B'nai Brith an incitement to genocide, which is defined as a criminal violation of the International Convention on Genocide (http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html).

On the basis of such specious logic, Norman Podhoretz (NPOD), Jonathan Podhoretz (JPOD) and many other Zionist extremists in the media, at various Zionist-funded think tanks, in the US government, and within North American academia are agitating for a preventative strike against Iran, which might develop nuclear weapons at some time in the future.

For argument's sake, let's accept the logic of Zionists and mainstream Jewish communal organizations.

Below is a movie clip that accurately depicts a speech given by Golda Meir before the UN. Not only does Golda Meir deny the 1947-48 Zionist genocide, which is called the Nakba or Catastrophe in Arabic and which is the Holoexaleipsis or total erasure (of Palestinians and Arab Palestine) in English, but she also denies the very existence the native Palestinian people.

Such behavior is clear expression of incitement and intent to commit the genocide that the State of Israel has been undertaking right before our eyes in the Palestinian occupied territories for the last 40 years because only genocide could make Meir's claims true. (MK Shulamit Aloni has called Israeli policy in the Occupied Territories retzah am itti or slow genocide in English.)

By the logic of Neocons and the organized Jewish community, does not the USA have a categorial imperative immediately to obliterate the Zionist military, which unlike Iran's is large, very strong, involved in ongoing genocide, and already armed with probably at least 150 nuclear weapons?

Golda: Paean to a Genocidal Zionist Fanatic

1 min 22 sec - Oct 10, 2007
Description:
Golda (1982, Paramount) is a biography of Golda Meir that is mostly hero worship and Labor Zionist
הסברה. The descriptions of the issues of Palestinian refugees and of access to Jerusalem are simply dishonest. The movie probably correctly but accidentally portrays her as a person that lacks any ethical awareness, understanding and impulses. In the clip presented above, Meir has the nerve to ask the self-serving question what population could remain a refugee population for 30 years even though she herself is the leader of the movement that made them refugees and even though the Zionist movement justifies its seizure of Palestine by means of the false primordialist argument that Jews have been refugees for 2000 years.




Sphere: Related Content

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

And exactly how is a preventative strike against Iran, not a genocidal act?

Joachim Martillo said...

I believe boosters of an attack on Iran argue that only military sites will be targets.

I know you will tell me that if I believe that, you have a wonderful bridge to sell me in Brooklyn, and I agree.

The psychotic warmongerers could also argue that obliterating a criminal group is not covered by the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which according to Article 2 only applies in the case of a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.

A Jewish racist that I met at Harvard Hillel made this argument during a discussion. I believe it was Douglas Feith's son.

In any case, if Neocons in general believe such a proposition, one could suspect that the likes of David Horowitz and Charles Jacobs engage in Islamophobic and Arabophobic incitement in order to convince the general American public that simply being Arab or Muslim is criminal so that a Neocon or Jabotinskian dominated government will be able to defend itself against charges of genocide if it destroys, in whole or in part, the Arab or Muslim population of the world by arguing that it eradicated a criminal group and not a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such.

Anonymous said...

Yes, the Arab/Muslims as the ultimate enemy - sounds like the Talmud.

Joachim Martillo said...

The Talmud is vast and one can find practically anything one wants in it.

Arabs or Ishmaelites are mentioned in the Talmud although not generally in a hostile way.

Islam crystallizes too late to be a topic except indirectly

The real issue is interpretation of the Talmud in a way that supports hostility toward non-Jews or encourages Zionist crimes.

Such understandings of scripture are particularly modern and often very Eastern European. We find similar exegesis among Eastern European Orthodox and Roman Catholic Christians.

The actual scripture is for the most part irrelevant as long as it can be interpreted allegorically or metaphorically.

Secular Eastern Europeans have generally not needed scripture to justify crimes against humanity.

Anonymous said...

Come on, Joachiom... Nothing to say about your shabby little conference? you are a coward.

Come on. Let your readers know how you idiots lied to CAIR and then lied to the Greek church.

Joachim Martillo said...

I do some professional conference organizing, and it was not the sort of conference that I would have put together.

I attended the Third North American Conference of the Palestine Solidarity Movement, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Friday, October 10 - Sunday, October 12, 2003.

That conference had some similar problems with venue.

I felt somewhat out of place at both of them because many of the speakers had their own agenda that really had little connection to Palestinians.

I felt sorry for Rabbi Weiss and his friend. I understand why they wanted to attend, but I also understand why so many attendees objected. Neturei Karta's presence made it seem that criticism of the State of Israel, Zionism and the Organized Jewish Community required some sort of Jewish validition to be acceptable even though some attendees wanted to bury the notion that American Jews have a special status in the USA as moral arbiteurs.

The lectures by Carlson, Howard, Siddique, Hunter, Tillawi, Cortina, Piper, and Töben were the most interesting but not necessarily because I agreed with the content.

Carlson indicates that a fissure may be opening up among white evangelicals about Israel while Hunter is indicative of the glimmerings of awareness among American Catholics of the magniture of the scam that the organized Jewish community is pulling on the Catholic Church.

I usually do not think much of WW2 Revisionists because they impress me as desirous of whitewashing German behavior during WW2, and no one of my background can possibly find such a stance acceptable. Yet, I was impressed by how much Töben seemed to like Iran and Iranian culture without connection to the positive reaction that he received at the Iranian Holocaust conference. (See Holoexaleipsis, Holocaust, Holosphage, and Holodomor.)

Danuta Becker put on exactly the sort of reality-disconnected presentation that I remembered from Chicago, but it is worthwhile to reflect on the similarity of ethnic Polish immigrants from the Radio Maria crowd to extremist Zionist Polish ethnic Ashkenazi immigrants like Charles Jacobs.

Mariani disparaged my law firm for doing its job.

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated.