Followup: Natalie Portman's Genocidal Racism ...

Zionist Web: Academia, Entertainment, Government

by Joachim Martillo (ThorsProvoni@aol.com)

 

On October 24, 2007, I posted Natalie Portman's Genocidal Racism and Utter Hypocrisy .

 

Recently, I received the following advertisement from Aish.com.

 

 

A-list actresses are extremely protective of their identity-brand. I cannot believe that Aish.com runs these adds without Portman's approval, but I will check.

 

Aish.com is the web presence of Aish HaTorah, which is a hybrid Jewish returnee (i.e., "born-again Jewish") extremist Israel advocacy organization. It is the Jewish face of the Zionist media intimidation organization known as HonestReporting.

Aish HaTorah is part of the network of Jewish organizations ideologically committed to the occult mystical Zionism of Rav Abraham Isaac Kook* and his son Tzvi Yehudah Kook. The media critic Michael Medved and the corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff** follow this sort of Zionism.

 

The Aish HaTorah advertisement connects to two Portman google-videos.

 

watch video

Video Description: Natalie Portman Talking About Her Love For Israel

 

watch video

Video Description: Natalie doing a surprise visit to Columbia University to talk about terrorism as part of V for Vendetta promotion.

In the first video, Portman tells us that Israel is her home without any acknowledgement that members of her E. European ethnic group simply stole the country from the native population and are continuing commit genocide right before our eyes according to a program that was formulated in cold-blood during the second half of the nineteenth century.

 

Portman later adds (in really atrocious Hebrew) that her feeling of roots there [in Israel] are hard to explain. She said something very similar to me once at Adams House at Harvard. I told her I was not surprised. When she was born, her family was probably living in a stolen house most probably on stolen land in a stolen country. Delusions about roots serve as one of the mechanisms used by far too many Jews and Christians to excuse the crimes that Zionists have been committing against the native Palestinian population for over a century.

 

At Adams House in the context of a Jewish-Arab dialogue, she had the nerve to tell me that Dershowitz did not plagiarize From Time Immemorial in his book The Case for Israel. She said she knew because she worked as one of Dershowitz' researchers. And I asked how many researchers there were. Apparently around twenty. And was Portman there from start to finish? No, she was not. Had she read From Time Immemorial? No, she had not. I offered to lend her my copy. She had no interest.

 

In the second video Portman acts as a typical Zionist apologist by cautioning against any acceptance of blame for any else's decision to commit evil.***

 

Portman avoided the two real questions.

1. Why do so many Jews believe that Jews should live in security and with impunity in Israel as a sort of reward for crimes committed by Zionists since the nineteenth century and ongoing even to this very day?
2. Why do so many Jews and so many very un-Christian evangelical fundamentalists believe that the USA should continue to spend US tax dollars to support the Israeli state, which routinely commits atrocities that invariably inspire terrorist acts as a response?

The cable broadcast of Portman's terrorism-shpil shows an interesting web of connections between Fox, Warner Bros., MTV, Portman, and Stuart Gottlieb at School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. 

Stuart Gottlieb (212-854-9282, smg16@columbia.edu) is Lecturer in Discipline of International and Public Affairs.

 

According to his Columbia profile,

[prior] to joining SIPA in 2003, Gottlieb worked for nearly five years in the United States Senate, first as senior foreign policy advisor to Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, and subsequently as policy advisor and chief speech writer for Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut. He has also worked on several political campaigns, including New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani's reelection campaign in 1997.

The web pages, http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Sen_Charles_Schumer/86/personal.html, http://www.legistorm.com/trip/traveler/Stuart_Gottlieb/4030.html, and http://www.legistorm.com/trip/sponsor/Jewish_Community_Relations_Council/7080.html, provide all sorts of interesting information about JCRC (Jewish Community Relations Council) largess to congressmen and their aides. Some of the aides like Stuart Gottlieb are themselves heavily involved in the Israel Lobby and apparently accompany the congressmen in a sort of minder capacity.

 

---

Notes

 

* During the 1930s and 1940s Rav Kook's nephew Hillel Kook (a.k.a. Peter Bergson) helped establish the American Jabotinskian Zionist movement that eventually developed into Neoconservatism. Despite this early connection between the Jabotinskian-Neoconservative and Kookian Zionist movements, the two Jewish political groups are not normally close collaborators.

 

** John McCain, who shills for Neoconservatives and who comes from a dynasty of American political Shabbes Goyim (Money Jews, Brain Jews, Politics), chaired the Senate Indian Affairs Committee and released Abramoff emails that implicated Abramoff in possible tax and wire fraud that included materially and financially supporting Israeli sniper and settler organizations that would be considered terrorist if US prosecutors applied the same standards to Jews as are applied to Muslims and Arabs. Since 2005 nothing has come out of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, which is now chaired by Senator Byron Dorgan, whose campaign received Abramoff contributions, which were returned when they came to light. The sudden dearth of information about Abramoff and Israel-related fraud at the time when McCain began to build up his campaign chest for the 2007 primary season has the smell of a hush-up or payoff. 

 

*** The pure un-Jewish antinomianism of the Zionist mentality is breath-taking. Traditional Rabbinic thought has always considered "lifnei `iver" one of the most heinous sins.  Literally it means "[putting a stumbling block] before the blind" and describes the offence of putting another person in a situation that would probably lead him into committing a transgression.

 

Sphere: Related Content