Help Fight Judonia!

Please help sustain EAAZI in the battle against Jewish Zionist transnational political economic manipulation and corruption.

For more info click here or here!

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Greg Mankiw's Blog: The Changing Meaning of "Subprime"

In discussing the Jewish Zionist input into the subprime meltdown, keeping track of the changing meaning of subprime is helpful. Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw, who is fellow graduate of The Pingry School, makes the following point at his blog.

Simon Winchester reports:

when first applied to financial matters in 1976, “subprime” meant a loan offered below the prime rate and typically was offered only to the most desirable borrowers.

In was not until 1993 that it took on a much less enticing guise, with Business Wire referring to a company that “buys subprime loans made ... to creditworthy buyers unable to qualify for loans from banks.”

And an O.E.D. editor was moved to write a new definition: “Of or designating a loan, typically having relatively unfavorable terms, made to a borrower who does not qualify for other loans because of a poor credit history.”

A lot of racist right-wing commentators are trying to blame the financial mess on low-income African American and Hispanic borrowers, but I used subprime adjustable rate mortgages several times in the 90s when my income was around half a million and I knew
  • that I would pay the loan off before the interest went up or
  • that I would be able to lock the loan into a good fixed rate within a year or too.
There are lots of subprime foreclosures in upscale white neighborhoods where the borrowers did not follow my example. Subprime mortgages did not cause the financial meltdown per se. The problem lies in the manner in which they were turned into tradable securities.

In all cases subprime loans are made when the combination of borrower desirability or the expected asset value appreciation would justify a lower interest rate because of (theoretically) significantly decreased risk to the lender.

Unfortunately for the USA and the world, too many finance professionals believed or wanted to believe the Neocon and Neoliberal Zionists when they hyped the economic boom
  • that would result from privatizing Iraqi state assets and
  • that was supposed to keep housing prices on a steady increase.
Sphere: Related Content

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Joachim's observations are right on the money as usual.

The false Manichaean world view he describes is compatible with a broader paranoid strain in US politics, but folks like the Newton jews he describes are distinguished by their abilitty to make these ideas appear intellectually serious at least to the uninformed. Cf. Harvey Kushner of Texas who recently debated Scott Horton of antiwar.com

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/09/12/scott-horton-debates-the-war-party/

In the university world the only folks I know who are supporting
McCain seem to do so because they fear Obama is unreliable on Israel.

On the Balfour Declaration, see what John Cornelius has written at WRMEA

http://www.washington-report.org/archives/November_2005/0511044.html

including his exposure of Barbara Tuchman:

http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0897/9708018.html

http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0998/9809057.html

http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/1099/9910057.html

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated.