Not only have a large group of economic oligarchs helped the Neocons tremendously in a political system where wealth has probably the largest voice, but the oligarchs and their Neocon intelligentsia have in process of formulating the ideological framework to mobilize the new rightwing Zionist wealth developed congruent speculative mentalities that thrived in and cultivated financial or political bubbles.
Conversely Jews were thought to be disproportionately represented in high risk areas of the economy, in illicit speculation in commodity futures, or the infamous "trading in the wind" on doubtfully generated stock issues. The opprobrium ensuing from the collapse of these ventures, while not at all a recurrence of the medieval usury syndrome, could still rebound on the Jews and reinforce their reputation for dubious behavior. Jewish sterotypes [sic], for example, feature all too prominently in one of Bernard Picart's most widely disseminated satirical prints on the windhandel of 1720.
Menahem-Mendle from Yehupetz to his wife, Sheineh-Sheindl, in Kasrilevka
To my dear, wise, and modest helpmeet, Sheineh-Sheindl, long may she live!
Firstly, I am come to inform you that I am, by the grace of God, well and in good cheer. May the Lord, blessed be His name, grant that we always hear from one another none but the best, the most comforting, and the happiest of tidings -- amen.
And Secondly, I want you to know that I am no longer a speculator. I spit on speculation -- may all Jews avoid it like the plague! It wore me out like a fever, it made me old and gray. What we endured here is no joke. It's all over with Yehupetz; the exchange is upside down; there's darkness everywhere -- it's like after a war -- even worse, perish the thought, than it was in Odessa! Everybody is done for and panic-stricken. People have taken to bankruptcy, and me in the middle. Every day, another defaulter. Bankruptcy has become very much in fashion. And what's more, the important bankers, the big shots, have started to make themselves scarce. In the van was the banker through whom we all used to handle with Petersburg and Warsaw. One bright morning I came to his office where I was stuck with some Maltzevs and several Putilov shares for which he was to get a small "difference" from me. I started asking around where he might be, our fine lord. So they tell me he departed, God rest his soul -- he's already in America! In short, there started a hue and cry, there was a rush to the iron safe, but nothing was found in it except a bottle of ink and an old worn-out coin -- with a hole in it, besides…. Another banker left a collection of Jewish calendars in his safe beginning with the year 1873 up to the present day, and he himself made off to Palestine. A third one -- and a very big banker indeed -- did not default but was simply plucked to the tune of several millions in a single week and was left with nothing but his good name. Only Brodsky somehow managed to scramble out of the mess by a miracle.
So I thought it over and came to the conclusion that if it isn't in the books, no amount of brains will do any good. At any rate, it's lucky I took a look around on time and managed to throw myself into a new job -- and a most respectable job, too. That is to say, I have now become a broker-simply a broker, in fact, a broker right here in Yehupetz on the stock exchange. There are as many brokers in Yehupetz, knock on wood, as stars in the sky -- so why should I be any worse than they? Haven't I also got hands and feet and a nose and eyes, just like any other Jew? Characters as wellborn as I are aplenty here -- and yet none considers himself too good to take his cane in hand and start on brokerage. Is it such a difficult science, come to think of it? As long as you know how to tell a lie and, on top of it, possess a good stock of impudence, anybody can become a broker. Quite to the contrary, the more lies and the greater impudence, the better the broker! Believe me, in Yehupetz there are some brokers who in your Kasrilevka would be good only as servants or coachmen -- they hardly know how to sign their names, and yet you can see for yourself -- as your mother says, "If it were the will of God, you'd shoot fire from a rod…." All you have to do is' put on a white shirt and a nice hat and start creeping, snooping, sniffing, eavesdropping -- a jump here, a bounce there, and: "My commission, if you please!" Commission in brokers' language is hush money. And oh, how sweet is commission money! You earn it without a headache, without a pain in your stomach. Why, only yesterday, I picked up a fifty in commission, and may you and I know a pain and an ache, if I know what I got it for! I made several tons of sugar with ease -- easier than smoking a cigarette. That is to say, the sugar was made by other people -- I simply found myself in the middle of the deal. In short, with God's help, I made a fifty! And, please God, in about a year's time, I'll get back on my feet again and become what I used to be, because with us in Yehupetz, money plays first fiddle. A human being is not worth a straw -- his origins, his ancestry, have no value at all. You may be anything and nothing -- so long as you have money! And since I'm very busy and pressed for time, I must cut this short. Please God, in my next letter, I'll write you everything in detail. For the time being, may the Lord grant health and success. Greet the children, God bless them, and give my kindest greetings to your father and mother, to old and young, to big and small.
From me, your husband, Menahem-Mendl.
Just remembered! Please write me what's new at home. Has it been raining? How are the beets getting on, and are there many beetles? Let me know as soon as possible because this is very important for me!
As above.
3 comments:
a couple of things - what do you make of birmingham's other book - the one called the grandees, where he looks at the sephardim in new york?
another - i am not sure you are aware of the following book written by joseph penso de la vega - quoted in ammiel alcalay's seminal book after jews and arabs (p. 186-187) - that argues against the dutch stock market and the speculative philosophy that underlies such financial activity.
http://www.amazon.com/Extraordinary-Delusions-Confusi%C3%B3n-Confusiones-Marketplace/dp/0471133124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1226843602&sr=1-1
in the end, the sephardic position is far more complicated because of the way the sephardic rabbis dealt with the matter of moneylending.
you also need to look at the arguments of jose faur who has long attacked the ashkenazim for this dubious practice - and who brought it to spain after the spanish reconquest. the ashkenazi rabbi asher ben yehiel - the ROSH - was himself a moneylender.
you can reference faur's discussions in his older book in the shadow of history as well as in his new work the horizontal society.
in the end, i am not sure that you have understood the sephardic position.
I am more familiar with the primary sources on Jewish law with regard to money lending than with specific ethnographic distinctions between Ibero-Berber and ethnic Ashkenazi financial practices, but I have read a lot of complaints about ethnic Ashkenazi practices by Italian Jewish scholars of the 15th century. A lot of the polemic by Polish Lithuanian Karaite Jewish Tatars against ethnic Ashkenazim related to ethnic Ashkenazi finance practices.
I know there are some Sefardi-Ashkenazi distinctions, which may relate to different economic and finance environments, but I only mentioned Schama mostly to contrast a speculative tendency and a speculative culture that exist relatively independent of Judaism.
In defense of ethnic Ashkenazim I must mention that a lot of capital for lending was provided by Polish magnates or the Catholic Church. Not only did they expect high returns, but they also were not always particularly forgiving if profitability targets were not met. It is possible to find Ashkenazi rabbis that condemn exploitation of peasants by ethnic Ashkenazi lenders and estate managers.
In any case, I will look at the books you recommend and blog them if they are relevant to my organization's mission.
I have not read this book by Birmingham -- mostly because I was somewhat irritated by Our Crowd because it was too light on the finance history. I will revisit Birmingham.
as for the church's own money-lending practices, the difference with that of the jews was that no one could default on the church - i would think that there would be more dire consequences than defaulting on a jewish creditor. this is not a negligible distinction.
faur's thesis is that the ashkenazim developed their legal strategies as an outgrowth of christian influence.
so even joseph karo - a sephardi - was beholden to this ideology. it is a very complex argument that has not been accepted by the mostly ashkenazi jewish academic fraternity.
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated.