Help Fight Judonia!

Please help sustain EAAZI in the battle against Jewish Zionist transnational political economic manipulation and corruption.

For more info click here or here!

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Hub of the World (Zionist Conspiracy)

Charles Jacobs is once again waging a campaign of Islamophobic incitement, and the discussion once again fails to address the heart of the issue.

Jacobs' business model depends on demonizing Muslims. The more he marginalizes Arab and Muslim American citizens, the more he creates a distraction from ongoing Zionist crimes against Palestinians, the more money he raises from Zionist political economic oligarchs.

Jacobs is not an isolated extremist within the Jewish community. He functions right at the heart, and mainstream Jewish communal organizations like the American Jewish Committee are just as much involved in subversion of the American political system as Israel Advocacy organizations.

Until the organized Jewish community rejects Islamophobic and un-American politics, the organized Islamic community only legitimizes Jewish Zionist bigotries and un-American activities by engaging with it.

Because the Boston Globe has provided space for Jacobs' new campaign against the Islamic Society of Boston and the Roxbury Islamic Community Center and because the Globe has provided such pitiful space for replies, which seem to be limited to a silly Islamophobic letter from a probably Jewish non-Muslim and another from Abdul Cader Asmal, I have provided a shortened and more focused version of Patterns of Boston Jewish Power.

Abbreviated Patterns of Boston Jewish Power

The future of Zionized American is taking shape in Boston, which has become a major command and control center for transnational Jewish politics and Zionist lobbying.

Just as Zionists literally bulldozed Rachel Corrie, who was an obstacle to Zionist plans in Palestine, the Jewish media-bureaucratic complex crushes whomever it pleases while the Jewish power elite has near total legal immunity.

Boston’s vociferously pro-Palestinian City Councilor Chuck Turner and former rather pro-Israel Massachusetts State Senator Diane Wilkerson look like the latest offerings to Boston Jewish power now that the compliant and politicized US Attorney’s office ran a year long sting operation to nab Wilkerson and then used the same informant to entrap Turner.

Inappropriate prosecutorial zeal has attracted judicial attention.

Marie Szaniszlo writes in Judge eyes prosecutors in pols’ arrests: “At a pretrial hearing in Boston [on July 2], Judge Douglas Woodlock said he wants to determine whether prosecutors tried to ‘gin things up’ in the public arena by disseminating photographs of the two allegedly accepting bribes.”

Boston African-American pastor Gloria White-Hammond provided indication of the logic behind the investigations when she suggested on WBUR that Boston African-Americans needed new leaders.

White-Hammond has long been a shabbesshikse for the most extremist racist segment of the Boston Jewish community. She served as loyal house nigger to Charles Jacobs in the fraudulent anti-Sudan, anti-Arab, and anti-Muslim campaign that his American Anti-Slavery Group ran in an early effort at poisoning human rights discourse to benefit the State of Israel.

White-Hammond failed Jacobs when he was attempting to incite Islamophobia by accusing the Islamic Society of Boston (ISB) of trying to create a haven for Islamic extremism by building a large Islamic Community Center in Roxbury. According to discovery documents revealed in various associated lawsuits, Jacobs contacted African-American church leaders to find a non-Jew to shill for Jacobs and his allies within the organized Jewish community.

Because all Boston-area African American leaders, who had sold themselves to the Jewish community, demurred (including White-Hammond), Jacobs settled for Italian-American Mission Hill resident James Policastro.

Yet White-Hammond managed not only to redeem herself to the organized Jewish community by leading Save Darfur efforts, but by early 2007 the organized Jewish community even seemed to be grooming her as a possible pro-Jewish African American political leader in the second Suffolk state senate district where she lives and later even began to raise her profile to national political level by arranging meetings with President Obama on bogus Darfur issues.

Back in 2007 with no evidence indicating that African American second Suffolk State Senator Diane Wilkerson was dirty and with conscious obliviousness to ongoing organized Jewish community bribery of US public officials with trips to Israel, the US Attorney seems to have begun an approximately year-long sting that used Wilkerson’s cash and tax problems to entrap her and that culminated in her Oct. 28, 2008 arrest.

Because Turner has long known the Jewish power elite has targeted him, he is extraordinarily careful about ethics violations, and a similar operation would have failed against him.

Nevertheless, approximately a month later Turner was arrested in another sting operation that appears to be an afterthought set up to intimidate Turner into resigning voluntarily.

Instead of arranging a series of private encounters and exchanges with Turner, the informant approached Turner in a crowded public setting, shoved a letter into Turner’s hand, and said something incomprehensible.

Eventually the informant became suspicious of the US Attorney's office when he realized that there were no ongoing Massachusetts investigations of white politicians. Likewise, all Americans should wonder whether studious inattention of the US Attorney’s office to prima facie federal criminal violations by Jacobs and associates indicated Zionist power trumped loyalty to the Constitution and especially the Fourteenth Amendment.

Not only do many Jewish organizations that long ago should have lost 501(c)(3) tax deductible status continue to discriminate and to incite racism effectively with US government subsidization, but Jewish financial predation has to be truly awesome before discussion of Jewish financial wrongdoing becomes even slightly possible, and to this day a Boston-area Jewish fraudster like longtime Madoff-associate Robert Jaffe has yet to face criminal charges.

Although the pattern of Jewish abuse of power extends well beyond the Boston area, much if not most American Jewish social, political, economic, and academic misbehavior links back to the Boston-area Jewish community or educational institutions where young Jews often first hook up with vast corrupt Jewish social networks.

No one should be surprised US Senator from Israel Joseph Lieberman has a strong Boston Jewish connection in his mechutenesta (co-in-law), the exceptionally maniacal incompetent Zionist Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse.

Because the hard power of the USA is vast while the Israel Lobby only has soft power, the Jewish power elite maintains its privilege via a pervasive web (the media-bureaucratic-academic complex?) that reaches into American society down to local levels and that keeps the vast majority of Americans confused, intimidated, or ignorant.

Using resources that the Boston-area affords as a major American and world education center has proven exceptionally efficient and provides an excellent means for the Boston Jewish power elite to spread tentacles both nationally and globally.


Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, July 09, 2009

[NYRB] Amos Elon (1926–2009)

In his obituary of Amos Elon, Tony Judt clings to the idea that there was once a good Zionism, which had some shortcomings yet was fairly decent before the post-1967 war occupation.

Amos Elon was an exemplar of thinking founded in the cognitive disconnect between Zionism's self-image and its long history combining apparently unbounded mendacity with serially increasing crimes against the native Palestinian population.

The following passage of the article reveals the delusions and false memories of so many "progressive" Jews unable to come to terms with Zionism's dishonesty.
For much of his working life Amos Elon was a journalist, employed by the liberal daily Haaretz. During the 1950s and 1960s he worked frequently as a foreign correspondent ranging from Communist Eastern Europe to Washington, D.C. He seems to have interviewed just about everyone, from John F. Kennedy (with whom he attended wild parties at the height of the Camelot years) to Yasser Arafat. He used to tell a revealing story. In an interview he conducted in the early 1960s in Washington, with a senior Israeli diplomat who was about to leave his post and return home, he questioned his fellow Israeli closely. "What do you think you achieved during your posting here in the US?" Elon asked him. "Oh, that's easy," the diplomat replied. "I believe I have succeeded in convincing Americans that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism." Back in those years, Amos told me, he found the diplomat's assertion simply bizarre; he could hardly then have imagined that this cynical political equation would become received opinion among his countrymen and their supporters.
Yosef Grodzinsky investigates the origin of the equation of Judaism with Zionism (and hence of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism) in his book In the Shadow of the Holocaust, The Struggle Between Jews and Zionists in the Aftermath of World War II. He found
  • that the idea can be traced to Zionist education at least as far back as the 1930s and
  • that both the international organized Jewish community and the WW2 Allies acquiesced in this idea when the Zionist leadership of Palestine in concert with Zionists in the DP camps thwarted the evacuation of Jewish children to Britain in 1945 and began drafting adult male Jewish Holocaust survivors as cannon fodder in the Zionist program of stealing Palestine from the native population.
If Elon was being honest about his reaction to the Israeli diplomat, Elon was in as deep denial as Judt seems to remain.

I was surprised that Judt considered Elon's book The Pity of It All to "[display] a fine sensitivity to the tragedy of Germany's Jews." Elon's account of German Jewish history has some value for its anecdotes, but serious historical analysis is absent.

Elon starts with Moses Mendelsohn's entry into Berlin (1743). Why? 1648 would have made more sense because it was the year the Treaty of Westphalia was signed. Then Elon could have explained the economic mess of the German countryside during the 18th century, and its effect on the relations between German Jews and non-Jews.

Elon's book never mentions

  • that the Kulturkampf took place or
  • that it had lasting effects on relations among German Protestants, German Catholics, German Jews, Polish Catholics, and Polish-Ashkenazim right into the period of the German Nazi regime.

Not only does Elon fail to discuss how the Prussian government effectively created a Jewish economic elite by its policy of only allowing the most entrepreneurial of Polish Jews to immigrate into Prussia or Prussian-ruled territories, but he also makes all sorts of tendentious or flat-out wrong claims about Czarist anti-Semitism.

Elon leaves out all discussion of the development of Modern Orthodoxy and its relationship with Zionism. Shimshon Rafael Hirsch and Isaac Breuer definitely deserved some mention. Breuer is very much a Tariq Ramadan-like figure in terms of reconciling Western philosophy and religion. He became an important political figure in New Yishuv but unlike Tariq Ramadan took part in a movement that pursued ethnic cleansing and the murder of unarmed women and children.

Complementing Elon's omissions, Judt fails to note in the very first paragraph of the obituary that the Bertelsmann-Stiftung meetings where Elon and Judt first met left out possible Palestinian attendees, whose mere presence would have facilitated a discussion of the commonality of German Nazism and Zionism (ethnic Ashkenazi Nazism) from the very beginnings of both movements.

Amos Elon (1926–2009)

By Tony Judt

I first met Amos Elon in Germany in the 1990s. We were participants in one of a series of meetings generously hosted by the Bertelsmann Foundation, where Germans, Israelis, and Jews gathered to exchange platitudes. Most of those present sought either to proselytize and grandstand (in the case of Israelis and Jews) or else to avoid giving offense (in the case of the Germans). Amos, uniquely, did neither. There, as on every occasion when I heard him speak, he succeeded in being both outspoken and yet somehow effortlessly sensible—he dominated conversation by force of reason. He had a mordant wit and a dismissive eye; he was contemptuous of fools and pedants; he smiled only rarely but when he did so it was real. He made a lasting impression upon me.

The German setting was altogether fitting. Amos, who was born in Vienna and was the author of an influential biography of Theodor Herzl, never lost his attachment to German culture and history, a subject on which he wrote frequently and with empathetic insight. The Pity of It All, his 2002 study of the Jewish presence in Germany from the Enlightenment to Hitler, displayed a fine sensitivity to the tragedy of Germany's Jews. For good and ill they remained profoundly attached to their cultural homeland, long after they were forced to leave it for Israel or America or elsewhere: more than the Jews of any other European land, they would feel their loss.[1]

[To read the entire obituary, click here.]


Sphere: Related Content

[State Ethics] Exclusion order on Pamela Geller

Even though the author of the article below really does not understand the nature of the Zionist Imperial System, he has produced a worthwhile summary of Pamela Geller's recent activities in manipulating European politics on behalf of Judonia.

Exclusion order on Pamela Geller

I have asked the Netherlands Justice Ministry to issue an exclusion order, barring Pamela Geller Oshry from the Netherlands, and I have asked the British Home Secretary to issue an exclusion order, barring her from the United Kingdom. Better known as Pamela Geller, she is the sole author of the xenophobic, racist, right-wing blog 'Atlas Shrugs'. (For coverage of the blog by others, see LGF Watch and GOVVS).

In general, I believe that the American right is America's problem. However, the US 'counter-jihadist' movement has begun building links with the xenophobic-populist parties in Europe, united by the fear of 'Eurabia'. They have adopted Geert Wilders in particular, and Pamela Geller is his strongest supporter in the US blogosphere. Like some other supporters there (e.g. Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch) she has now begun fundraising for him.
[To read the entire article, click here.]

Sphere: Related Content

[Tikun Olam-תקון עולם] Shlomo Momo

I am becoming somewhat bored with the pubic theme of Zionist diplomacy, but Richard Silverstein's blog entry entitled Shlomo Momo’s Mojo Hits Birthright Go-Slow is worth referencing in order to highlight the multidimensional nature of this sort of Zionist outreach. The x-axis has Jewish and non-Jewish coordinates while the y-axis coordinates are heterosexual and homosexual.

Shlomo Momo’s Mojo Hits Birthright Go-Slow

Shlomo Momo Lifschitz hawks Sexual Zionism

I really couldn’t help myself on that post title. There must be a little of the Hollywood Variety headline editor in me. At any rate, Jewish Week reports that Birthright tour impresario Shlomo “Mojo” Lifschitz, whose Oranim Educational Initiatives hosted more trips (50,000 “satisfied” customers) than any other tour provider, has parted company with Birthright.

For some odd reason, a guy who helped coin and market the term “sexual Zionism” has hit a wall. I guess his hard-sell proselytizing for making Jewish babies and aliyah is no longer in favor.

[To read the entire article, click here.]

Posted using ShareThis
Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Touch Non-Jew, Wash Hands

Fanatic racist Zionists Charles Jacobs and BC Professor Dennis Hale made a big deal in their inflammatory Globe op-ed [Muslim] Leaders are extremist of an unsubstantiated allegation that Yale PhD candidate Yasir Qadhi claimed:
Christians are theologically "filthy.''
If Muslims are to be subjected to such scrutiny by Zionist demagogues, Americans should take a closer look at Jewish thinking, culture, behavior and religious practices in order to form a better judgment whether Americans and Israeli Jews really share culture and values.

Here is a daily halakha (Jewish law) in which Rabbi Eli Mansour discusses the possible tum'ah (spiritual filthiness or contamination) that arises from contact with a non-Jew:

Rav Haim Palachi (Turkey, 1788-1869), in a number of his works (Leb Haim, Ruah Haim and Kaf Ha’haim), cites a source from the Zohar indicating that gentiles transmit Tum’a (the Halachic status of ritual impurity) even while they are alive. As such, anytime one touches the body of a gentile, even if he simply shakes the gentile’s hand, he must wash his hands to rid them of this status of Tum’a.

However, the Peri Megadim (Rabbi Yosef Teomim, 1727-1792) noted that the widespread practice is to be lenient in this regard, and not to require washing after shaking hands or having any other contact with a non-Jew. The reason is that the formal Halachic status of ritual impurity is something that applies only to Jews. Tum’a has the potential to surface only when there is Kedusha (sanctity), and thus only Jews, who are endowed with the status of Kedushat Yisrael, are subject to the Halachic status of Tum’a.

As a practical matter, it would of course be very difficult to wash one’s hands after every time he shakes hands with a gentile, and one may therefore certainly rely on the prevalent custom not to require hand washing. Of course, one who can follow the stringent view of Rav Haim Palachi may do so, though obviously this should not be done publicly, in order to avoid enmity and ill-will between us and our non-Jewish neighbors and acquaintances.

It should be noted that one who, for whatever reason, goes to a non-Jewish cemetery must wash his hands after leaving the cemetery.

Summary: One must wash his hands after leaving a non-Jewish cemetery, but washing is not required after touching a living non-Jewish person, such as after a handshake.
The discussion may be audited through the hyperlinks below.
  • Clip Length: 1:52 (mm:ss)
  • (File size: 440 KB)
  • (File size:452 KB)
Some vocabulary may be helpful besides the words defined in the passage above.

Netilat yadaim is used for handwashing in blessings.
[The Hebrew word that normally would be used for "washing hands" is rochetz yadayim, but instead in the blessing we say al netilat yadayim, which literally means "the lifting up of the hands." This symbolizes that the hands are "lifted" to a higher level and are being consecrated for nobler deeds in fulfillment of G-d's mitzvot. We wash them out of respect to our Maker (Shabbat 50b).]
Mahmir is strict.

Makpid is careful.

Goy means non-Jew or gentile.


Asur means forbidden.

Rabbi Mansour has a sort of Yiddish yeshivish accent but is trying hard to mantain a Sefardic or Israeli Hebrew pronunciation.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Comments, Refutation: Leaders are Extremist

This past Sunday, Charles Jacobs and BC Professor Dennis Hale really outdid themselves in slogging the disinformatsia, hatred, and racist Zionist Islamophobic incitement on the Boston Globe Op-Ed page.
 
Below is the article with commentary in red italics.

Leaders are extremist

LAST WEEKEND marked a milestone in the history of interfaith relations in Boston. On Friday, local Muslims, public officials, and interfaith leaders celebrated the opening of the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center in Roxbury - a religious complex paid for largely by the Saudis

If we care so much that Saudi donors contributed to the ISBCC, shouldn't we look into who is funding the Americans for Peace and Tolerance, the David Project, Christians and Jews United for Israel, and similar Israel Advocacy or Jewish communal organizations?

Big racist Jewish Zionist money backs their projects -- whose is it? What is sauce for the goose is gravy for the gander. A lot of Jewish Zionist behavior merits investigation:
Clarion Fund: Anti-Muslim DVD to All U.S. Clergy, Lay Leaders on Behalf of Evangelicals Who Reject Prohibition Against Endorsing Candidates.

and run by what federal authorities describe as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood.

So what? Zionists demonize the Muslim Brotherhood, but it is a relatively mainstream modernizing democratically inclined movement.

Some milestone! The city has helped the Wahhabi clerical establishment - purveyors of the most intolerant religious teachings on the planet - and the Muslim Brotherhood - genesis of all Sunni terrorist organizations - set up shop in the Cradle of Liberty, flying a false flag of moderation. And to make matters worse, this sad milestone is praised as a great victory for diversity and a boon to local Muslims.

Which group is setting up shop? The Muslim Brotherhood, which is an Egyptian, Palestinian and Jordanian movement for the most part, or the official Saudi Islamic bureaucracy. The two groups are generally not fans of one another, and this use of the term Wahhabi is comparable to the use of the term Judaics instead of Jews by those with some sort of animus against Judaism or Jewish people.

The Muslim Brotherhood like Americans in the colonial period has been willing to rise up against tyrannical and undemocratic governments. So what? We Americans can empathize.

And the Mosque is a boon to the mostly African American and African origin community it serves and for the whole Boston Sunni community during Ramadan and Eid ul Adha when the community needs a large prayer hall.

Meanwhile, those who criticize this arrangement are branded as bigots and dragged into court,

Maybe because they are. The right to assemble and to worship freely is for the most part an unqualified right in the Federal and State Constitution. Jacobs, Hale and their friends are engaging in the federal crime known as conspiracy against rights. The US Attorney should investigate, arrest, charge, try, convict, and imprison Jacobs, Hale, and their financial supporters:

Where is the US Attorney?

while the press and public officials ignore the links between the leaders of the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center and Islamist hatred and terrorism. These claims are supported by tens of thousands of pages of evidence - much of it delivered to us by the society as a result of the discovery process triggered by their own lawsuit.

I have read through most of the discovery materials. I don't have a clue to what Jacobs and Hale are referring, but the materials did include fairly clear evidence that the NE Israel consulate conspired with Jacobs, Stephen Emerson, and a plethora of Jewish racists or Islamophobes against the Constitutional rights of Muslims.

  • So why worry? What will the following facts portend for the future of interfaith harmony in Boston and of the venerable and moderate Muslim community of Boston?

    • The Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center offers courses from the Islamic American University, whose vice chairman is Jamal Badawi, a trustee of the center, and headed by Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, a hate-mongering preacher from the Gulf who has been banned from Egypt and the United States.

      Sheikh al-Qaradawi is a popular modernist and moderate Islamic scholar. Lots of people are banned from Egypt for taking pro-democratic, anti-dictatorial stands, but al-Qaradawi entertained an interfaith delegation at his Egyptian home during the first half of July.

      As the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, he praises suicide bombers, debates the correct way to murder homosexuals, and has urged that the Jews be murdered "to the last one.''

      This statement is a fairly serious distortion of his positions, and I could probably write several volumes of commentary on Qaradawi's thought. Thus, I have to confine myself to pointing out that
      • that in Massachusetts we have long considered John Brown to have been a hero for waging a campaign
        • that was directed against violent state-sponsored racism of the sort that characterizes Zionism,
        • that included hacking living slavers to death, and
        • that ultimately proved suicidal, and
      • that as a religious matter Islam, Christianity and Judaism consider fairly similar sexual-intercourse-related acts, whose definitions do not always map simply into modern Western terminology, to be grave offenses according to divine revelation, whose interpretation and whose required punishments often remain a source of contentious disagreement even among the scholars within a single religious community: Origins: Zionist Gay Pubic Diplomacy
        and
      • that Nuremberg Law gives Palestinians the right to kill every single Zionist within Palestine while the International Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide almost certainly obligates all signatories to aid Palestinians in taking action against the criminal Zionist conglomeration that has seized control of Palestinian territories: Homeless in Gaza.
    • Trustee Walid Fitahi has claimed that according to the Koran, Jews are "killers of the Prophets,''

      I usually distinguish Judahite, Jehudites, Judeans, Jews and ethnic Ashkenazim, but if we use for Jew to apply to all these distinct forms of identity, I have to refer to Acts 7:52, 
    "Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become;
    ................................................................................
    τίνα τῶν προφητῶν οὐκ ἐδίωξαν οἱ πατέρες ὑμῶν; καὶ ἀπέκτειναν τοὺς προκαταγγείλαντας περὶ τῆς ἐλεύσεως τοῦ δικαίου, οὗ νῦν ὑμεῖς προδόται καὶ φονεῖς ἐγένεσθε,
    ................................................................................
    quem prophetarum non sunt persecuti patres vestri et occiderunt eos qui praenuntiabant de adventu Iusti cuius vos nunc proditores et homicidae fuistis
    2 Chr. 36:16,
    but they continually mocked the messengers of God, despised His words and scoffed at His prophets, until the wrath of the LORD arose against His people, until there was no remedy.
    ................................................................................
    καὶ ἦσαν μυκτηρίζοντες τοὺς ἀγγέλους αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐξουδενοῦντες τοὺς λόγους αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐμπαίζοντες ἐν τοῖς προφήταις αὐτοῦ ἕως ἀνέβη ὁ θυμὸς κυρίου ἐν τῷ λαῷ αὐτοῦ ἕως οὐκ ἦν ἴαμα
    ................................................................................
    וַיִּהְיוּ מַלְעִבִים בְּמַלְאֲכֵי הָאֱלֹהִים וּבֹוזִים דְּבָרָיו וּמִתַּעְתְּעִים בִּנְבִאָיו עַד עֲלֹות חֲמַת־יְהוָה בְּעַמֹּו עַד־לְאֵין מַרְפֵּא׃
    ................................................................................
    at illi subsannabant nuntios Dei et parvipendebant sermones eius inludebantque prophetis donec ascenderet furor Domini in populum eius et esset nulla curatio
    Jer. 2:30,
    "In vain I have struck your sons; They accepted no chastening. Your sword has devoured your prophets Like a destroying lion.
    ................................................................................
    μάτην ἐπάταξα τὰ τέκνα ὑμῶν παιδείαν οὐκ ἐδέξασθε μάχαιρα κατέφαγεν τοὺς προφήτας ὑμῶν ὡς λέων ὀλεθρεύων καὶ οὐκ ἐφοβήθητε
    ................................................................................
    לַשָּׁוְא הִכֵּיתִי אֶת־בְּנֵיכֶם מוּסָר לֹא לָקָחוּ אָכְלָה חַרְבְּכֶם נְבִיאֵיכֶם כְּאַרְיֵה מַשְׁחִית׃
    ................................................................................
    frustra percussi filios vestros disciplinam non receperunt devoravit gladius vester prophetas vestros quasi leo vastator
     
    Mat. 23:35,
    so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.
    ................................................................................
    ὅπως ἔλθῃ ἐφ' ὑμᾶς πᾶν αἷμα δίκαιον ἐκχυννόμενον ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ἀπὸ τοῦ αἵματος Ἅβελ τοῦ δικαίου ἕως τοῦ αἵματος Ζαχαρίου υἱοῦ Βαραχίου, ὃν ἐφονεύσατε μεταξὺ τοῦ ναοῦ καὶ τοῦ θυσιαστηρίου.
    ................................................................................
    ut veniat super vos omnis sanguis iustus qui effusus est super terram a sanguine Abel iusti usque ad sanguinem Zacchariae filii Barachiae quem occidistis inter templum et altare
    Talmud Sanhedrin 43a 

    It is taught: On the eve of Passover they hung Yeshu and the crier went forth for forty days beforehand declaring that "[Yeshu] is going to be stoned for practicing witchcraft, for enticing and leading Israel astray.  Anyone who knows something to clear him should come forth and exonerate him."  But no one had anything exonerating for him and they hung him on the eve of Passover. 

    Ulla said: Would one think that we should look for exonerating evidence for him?  He was an enticer and G-d said (Deuteronomy 13:9) "Show him no pity or compassion, and do not shield him." 

    Yeshu was different because he was close to the government.

    On this particular issue the Quran says nothing whatsoever different from the Hebrew and Christian Bibles or the Talmud!

    responsible for the "oppression, murder, and rape of the worshipers of Allah.''

    I read about such behavior on the part of Israeli Jews every day in the news.

    Yet Fitahi was chosen to read Koranic passages at the ribbon-cutting ceremony.
     
    • ISB records show that the organization has both received money from and donated money to organizations that were later investigated or shut down for terrorist activities. Among the recipients of ISB largesse are the Benevolence International Foundation - an Al Qaeda charity - and the recently convicted Holy Land Foundation - a Hamas charity.

      I have investigated the case of Enaam Arnaout (BIF). He was railroaded into prison on trumped up charges while the HLF was a witch hunt that depended on anonymous Israeli testimony and evidence obtained from tortured Palestinians: From Epistemic to Bureaucratic Islamophobia.

      We should really be asking why the US Treasury has not added the IDF to the list of designated terrorist organizations since the Gaza Rampage:
      ACLU Misses Zionist Islamophobic Conspiracy.

    These are the people who will now be ministering to the spiritual needs of the local Muslim community and bringing to the center preachers who share their views.

    Case in point: The ISB invited Yasir Qadhi to speak at its Cambridge mosque in March. Qadhi is a Holocaust denier who preaches that Jews want to destroy Muslims and that Christians are theologically "filthy."

    Qadhi made some statements long ago which were actually correct but he used unreliable sources: Haaretz Confirms: Two Separate Holocausts.

    The record of the Bush administration and ongoing discussion about attacking Iran certainly does indicate that Jewish Zionist Neocons have a plan to incinerate one Arab or Muslim country after another: Why Not Remove Zionist Interlopers?

    Muslims, Christians, and Jews have problems with each other's theology. So what? They are different religions: Touch Non-Jew, Wash Hands.

    An earlier ISB preacher, Salah Soltan, claims that the Israelis use the skulls of Palestinian babies as ashtrays.

    I have no idea who this person is, and if he did say something on this order, he was probably speaking metaphorically and certainly not unreasonably. I could respond by citing lots of random Jews that say lots of hateful things about Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, and non-Jews in general.

    Are these invitations or the warped views of Qaradawi, Fitahi, and Badawi simply irrelevant to the future of interfaith relations in Boston? Or does the city's willingness to cooperate with such people constitute a great betrayal of the local Muslim community?

    It is more warped that Muslims are scrutinized so carefully but no one is taking a careful look at the racist and extremist views of far too many Boston-area Jews and non-Jewish Zionists: Followup: Harvard Sharia/Apostasy Debate.

    While we were demonstrating against this extremist leadership outside the mosque last week, we got a chilling look at the future of diversity in Boston. One of the imams who came over to talk with us denied the existence of slavery in the Sudan and said that preaching death for homosexuals is an "opinion'' to which Qaradawi is "entitled.''

    The fraud of Jacobs' claims about slavery was exposed long ago while a theological opinion is not necessarily indicative of the practice. Jewish law considers homosexuals to be hayevei mitah (liable to death) but the exact mapping of the concepts of homosexual and "liable to death" from sacred to secular is unclear. Islamic opinion is no different and the record of the Ottoman Empire's application of Sharia law shows that simplistic interpretations of sound bytes are highly misleading: The Dialectic of American Islam.

    And an angry Muslim youth from the mosque informed us that it was common knowledge that the Jews had tried to assassinate and "betray'' the prophet Mohammed. Consequently, he claimed that Jews could be discriminated against "to some extent.''

    The Muslim youth and non-Jewish youth in general should be angry. Laws are being enforced one way for the Jewish power elite and another way for everyone else. One has to wonder why the rules that apply to tax deductible 501(c)(3)  status organizations do not apply to those with which Jacobs and Hale are associated. It is time for equal enforcement and for the purging of those government officials that are giving Jewish Zionist racists a pass on anti-racism rules and the criminal code: One Law for All Americans. 

    No sensible person believes that this is what multiculturalism is supposed to mean - and it is way past time for sensible citizens to demand answers to questions about the leaders of the new Islamic Center in Roxbury.

    Does the Jacobsian sense of multiculturalism include a place for those that oppose Zionist atrocities and Zionist racism? Does Jacobs' understanding of tolerance include tolerance for anti-Zionist American citizens? Last time I looked the US Constitution did not obligate American citizens to support Zionism or the State of Israel.

    Is it permissible to have an open discussion whether the alliance between the USA and Israel is compatible with American values and understanding of core principles like anti-racism, democracy, and human rights? In a time of economic meltdown shouldn't we really be discussing the approximately $6 trillion cost of Israel to the USA and the approximately $100 billion subsidy that we give to Israel every year? Isn't the issue of the Roxbury Mosque simply a red herring to distract from the real issue: Isn't it time to claw-back about $6 trillion dollars from Jacobs, his backers, and American Zionist subversives in general for the fraud that they have committed against the USA: Collection: Chief Zionist Frauds?

    Dennis Hale is a member of the Political Science Department at Boston College. Charles Jacobs is president of Americans for Peace and Tolerance. Both headed organizations that were sued by ISB.

    Both men should be in jail for conspiracy against rights and tax fraud.


    Sphere: Related Content

    Monday, July 06, 2009

    Jewish Taqiya (تقية) from Aish Hatorah

    Followup: Lubovitcher Rebbe and Jewish Taqiya (تقية)

    The blog entry Truth In Kiruv? Not With Aish HaTorah, Woman Says consists almost entirely an article entitled Aish HaTorah – Being Reform in an Orthodox Setting that was written by Elizabeth Klatzky and that recently appeared on JWeekly.com. She discusses Jew-on-Jew Taqiya (تقية).

    Aish HaTorah – Being Reform in an Orthodox Setting
    by elizabeth katzki, JWeeekly.com

    I should have known that a trip advertised on the side of my Facebook page would not be what it seemed, but it just looked so enticing. How could I not take advantage of a trip to New York (everything but the flight) for only two hundred dollars? I decided to apply for the Women’s’ Future Jewish Enterprisers two-week trip in New York.

    One day later, after sending in my resume and background information to Aish HaTorah New York, I got a call back informing me that I had been accepted and should book my flight. I did just that, and one week later, I was on my way to Newark Airport, excited and ready to meet important Jewish business people.

    I did meet important Jewish business people, such as William Lauder, Jill Granoff, Neil Cole, Robert Hormats, and many more, but these introductions came with information I did not necessarily want. I understood that this was a Jewish trip, and I was excited to get in touch with my Judaism again, but I definitely did not want to hear about Orthodox Judaism day in and day out.
    [To read the entire FailedMessiah blog entry, click here.]

    I linked through FailedMessiah.com because the FailedMessiah blog entry includes some useful links describing the ongoing Islamophobic Aish/Clarion Fund/Obsession/Third Jihad exercise in Jewish taqiya.

    I have my own list for articles discussing the "prudential dissimulation" in which Aish, various Jewish individuals, and several Jewish organizations have been collaborating as part of an ongoing program of demonization, defamation, and marginalization of Islam as well as of American Muslims. You can find it here.
    Sphere: Related Content

    Sunday, July 05, 2009

    Lubovitcher Rebbe and Jewish Taqiya (تقية)

    Amazing behind the scenes look at the crazies running Israel from The Vineyard of the Saker examines the Jewish fundamentalism captured in the videoclip The First Thing When Moshiach Comes:
    Even though the Saker is wrong to conclude that crazies like the deceased Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson are running Israel (see Chabad, Jewish Political Elites), the video and the article do highlight some important facets of Jewish and Zionist behavior.
    • Because Lubavitchers and Hassidim in general consider money touched by a Rebbe to be something special, the video focuses on the passing of money from this Rebbe to his followers.
    • Despite the claims of messianic Lubavitchers, who believe that Schneerson is the Jewish Messiah, he seems to be more or less denying himself any messianic status in his conversation with Rav Gershon Salamon.
    • To my ears Schneerson seems rather uncomfortable in Modern Israeli Hebrew (certainly in comparison with Salamon) and at a few points on the clip seems to be on the verge of stammering.
    • The Rebbe makes a conscious effort to avoid Zionist terminology by using eretz Yisrael (the land of Israel) instead of medinat Yisrael (the State of Israel) and by using am yisrael (people of Israel) instead of haam hayehudi (the Jewish people).
    • The Rebbe seems to be referring to a discussion in which he participated along with Yitzchak Shamir and other Israeli government official and in which it was agreed that the Israeli negotiators would feign to negotiate with the Arabs in order dishonestly to convince the public and in particular Jews that Israel was engaging in peace talks in good faith.
    It is hard to give a better example of practicing taqiya (تقية) or kitman (كتمان), and as a Jewish religious scholar Schneerson would have been aware that the RAMBAM (Maimonides) gives permission to Jews to engage in prudential or precautionary dissimulation under various circumstances.

    The Saker provides a pointer to The Hasidic Gentile Campaign: The Rebbe Speaks, which includes a list of the goals of Lubavitcher outreach to non-Jews. One of the important action items is:

    Encouraging the abandonment of Christianity: "...according to the known Jewish legal ruling that Christians are idol worshippers. --Likutei Sichos 37:198, from a letter of the Rebbe dated 26 Iyra, 5726, cited in Kol Boi HaOlam, p. 389.


    Sphere: Related Content

    Saturday, July 04, 2009

    Arab Tributes to Michael Jackson

    On the Mondoweiss blog Seham points out:
    Arabs loved Michael Jackson, they loved him, unapologetically.
    The phenomenon may be linked to the relative ease with which African American Muslims connect into Arab Islamic transnational social networks.

    The development and growth of such hybrid African American-Arab-Islamic connections freaks out racist Jewish Zionists,
    • who have worked hard to develop African American leaders as a form of human capital manipulable in the service of Jewish interests and
    • who tend to view Arab-Islamic networks of trust as competitors to similar Jewish structures in the media, in academics, in politics, and in finance.
    In an Arab-dominated social network an African American Muslim is not necessarily more welcome than a Pakistani Muslim, but African Americans offer something priceless because the vast majority understand American politics far better than an Arab or Pakistani typically does after completing a doctorate at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

    Overall African Americans are likely to find more common ground with Arabs and Pakistanis than they will in Euro-American networks and certainly more than in Jewish social networks.

    Because slavery and then effective reenslavement of African Americans from the end of reconstruction until WW2 prevented African Americans from cultivating their own social networking as effectively as other Americans have, increasing links between the US and the Arab Islamic world may help overcome one of the major structural disadvantages that African Americans have suffered despite all civil rights efforts.

    The tributes below indicate the potential aid that the Arab Islamic world can give the US in healing one of the major rifts in American culture and society once Jewish Zionist power is broken in the USA and the Jewish power elite is carted off for a long stretch in prison.

    Saudi:



    Tunisian:



    Lebanese:


    Sphere: Related Content

    Friday, July 03, 2009

    Patterns of Boston Jewish Power

    In a court hearing on July 2, Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner proposed a conspiracy theory to explain why former US Attorney Michael Sullivan targeted him and former Massachusetts State Senator Diane Wilkerson for entrapment. Turner's key point from the email at the end of this blog entry is:
    [Prosecutor] McNeil is so determined to silence me, he has exposed the fact that this trial has nothing to do with justice. It's really about the deal that Sullivan made with Bush, Cheney, and Ashcroft. What do I mean by that? I personally believe that former Attorney General Ashcroft said to Sullivan that if he could take down Senator Wilkerson and myself, he would put up the money to open the firm of Ashcroft and Sullivan in Boston where they could try to secure business for Halliburton to serve as a base while Sullivan prepares for his run for Governor. Ashcroft seems to have made similar deals with three other US Attorneys in other parts of the country. In other words the quid pro quo for taking us down was the money to open the office.
    Unlike Wilkerson, whose money and tax problems made her an easy target for entrapment, Turner is a straight-arrow with regard to soliciting and receiving contributions.

    Even though I have no particular interest in most aspects of Green Rainbow Party agenda, I became involved with the party and with Turner because of their clear pro-Palestinian position and sympathy for the Roxbury Mosque project. I once suggested that he send out an e-mailing to advertise for a Green Rainbow Party Fundraiser, and he rejected the idea because a city or state employee might open up the email at work and put Turner in technical violation of election rules forbidding solicitation of public employees by a political campaign during working hours.

    The behavior of the US Attorney's office has been curious in this case to say the least. Marie Szaniszlo writes in Judge eyes prosecutors in pols’ arrests:
    A federal judge yesterday gave prosecutors two weeks to explain why the arrests of former state Sen. Dianne Wilkerson and City Councilor Chuck Turner on corruption charges last year were conducted in such a highly publicized manner.

    At a pretrial hearing in Boston, Judge Douglas Woodlock said he wants to determine whether prosecutors tried to “gin things up” in the public arena by disseminating photographs of the two allegedly accepting bribes.

    Woodlock said he wants affidavits by July 16 explaining why Turner and Wilkerson were shown being led into court, whether they were restrained and, if they were, how they posed a threat to the community or risk of flight.

    Yet the top-down Ashcroft conspiracy hypothesis would require that Ashcroft, Cheney, and Bush take an interest in local Boston politics beyond plausibility outside of the small circle that considers Boston to be the hub of the universe.

    A more likely theory of the reasoning behind the investigation of Wilkerson and Turner can be developed in a more bottom-up approach that looks at the record of prosecution or persecution of those offending the organized Boston Jewish community and its members in some way.

    The nastiness of this group is legendary and probably developed in response to Fathers Coughlin and Feeney. As Boston Jewish wealth, power, and influence have increased so has its ability to punish those running afoul of it.

    The animosity between former Massachusetts Senate President Billy Bulger and attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Harvey Silverglate has been an ongoing drama since Dershowitz and Silverglate accused Bulger of Irish tribalism for pushing Governor Dukakis to nominate Paul Mahoney for a judgeship in 1990. [The reciprocal accusations of ethnic prejudice among Bulger, Dershowitz, Silverglate, and Mahoney go back at least to 1983. 1990 seems to be the year when Boston ethnic dominance shifted to the Boston Jewish power elite.]

    After Governor Weld appointed Bulger to serve as UMass President where he might have proven an impediment to Zionist control of academic discourse (if only to spite Dershowitz), Governor Mit Romney forced him to resign, and Bulger became the target of a six-year long investigation by the US Attorney's office.

    Former Massachusetts House Speaker Paul DiMasi became an obstacle to Sheldon Adelson's casino building plans, and he was indicted in a "pay for play" scheme.

    Aafia Siddiqui, who was a graduate student in cognitive neuroscience at Brandeis, was demonized as a bioterrorist because she had the temerity to engage in Muslim activism at the Boston area's Jewish university.

    The case constructed against Siddiqui has the flavor of psychotic paranoia that I have observed in Matthew Levitt's anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic fantasies. During the Bush administration Newton-bred Levitt was a close associate of both Ashcroft and Treasury official Stuart Levey,
    • who continues in the Obama administration as an American Jewish Committee (AJCom) covert operative and
    • who manipulates the US government into carrying out Zionist legal warfare again Palestinian and Islamic financial institutions and charities.
    Perhaps because of the similarity in names of Siddiqui's estranged husband Amjad Khan and American legal resident Majid Khan, the US government forced the Pakistani government to turn over Majid, who had been visiting his family in Pakistan and who has been held ever since in Guantanamo.

    Newton Jewish legal aggression ratcheted up several notches when Charles Jacobs, who then headed the David Project (DP), organized a conspiracy against the rights of Boston-area Muslims for daring to build a large mosque right in the midst of the Boston Jewish sphere of influence.

    When Jacobs was planning his offensive against Boston-area Muslims, the DP according to the discovery documents contacted African American church leaders in an effort to find a non-Jew to shill for the DP and its allies within the organized Jewish community. Because Gloria White-Hammond has served Jacobs and the organized Jewish community as a loyal house nigger in anti-Sudan, anti-Arab, and anti-Muslim campaigns for so long, the email was probably referring to her, but she like apparently all other Jewish-domesticated African American leaders demurred, and the David Project had to settle for Mission Hill resident James Policastro.

    Later White-Hammond managed not only to redeem herself to the organized Jewish community by serving in the Jewish Zionist anti-Sudan, anti-Arab Save Darfur campaign, but by 2007 the organized Jewish community even seemed to be grooming her as a possible pro-Jewish African American political leader in the second Suffolk state senate district where she lives.

    At this point, despite any evidence that African American second Suffolk State Senator Diane Wilkerson was dirty and ignoring all the ongoing bribery of US public officials by the organized Jewish community with trips to Israel, the US Attorney seems to have begun a sting operation that culminated in her arrest on Oct. 28, 2008. Approximately, a month later Turner was arrested in another sting operation. The two stings were connected by the same informant, but the Turner operation has the appearance of an afterthought to remove a politician that offended powerful local Jewish Zionists.

    Soon after the inauguration of President Barak Obama, White-Hammond took part in a Darfur discussion with him and raised her political visibility tremendously. When White-Hammond was asked on WBUR about the legal difficulties of the two African American politicians, she suggested that Boston African Americans might need some new leaders, but she may have spoken prematurely because recently the government's informant announced that he would no longer cooperate with the prosecution.

    Just as the informant became suspicious of the US Attorney's office when it began to appear that there were no ongoing Massachusetts investigations of white politicians (or apparently anyone beyond Wilkerson and maybe Turner), all Americans should wonder whether the studious obliviousness of Sullivan and his staff to prima facie federal criminal violations by Jacobs, the DP and co-conspirators indicated the Zionist power has trumped loyalty to the Constitution and especially the Fourteenth Amendment.

    In other words while those disliked by powerful Jews and Zionist political economic oligarchs suffer legal difficulties, the Jewish power elite has legal immunity especially in the Boston area.

    Not only do many Jewish organizations that long ago should have lost 501(c)(3) tax deductible status (like the DP) continue to discriminate and to incite racism effectively with US government subsidization, but Jewish financial predation has to be truly awesome before any discussion of the pattern of Jewish financial wrongdoing becomes even slightly possible, and to this day a Boston-area Jewish fraudster like longtime Madoff-associate Robert Jaffe has yet to face criminal charges.

    To add constitutional insult to constitutional injury, racist Jews like US Commission on Civil Rights Vice-Chair and former Massachusetts Board of Education member Abigail Thernstrom continue to insist on Jewish victim status
    • while ADL National Director Abraham Foxman demonizes all Muslims and
    • while Jewish Zionist Neocons scheme to manipulate the USA into incinerating one Muslim or Arab country after another.
    Although the pattern of anti-American Jewish and sometimes Jewish Zionist abuse of power extends well beyond the Boston area, much if not most of American Jewish social, political, economic, and academic misbehavior links back to the Boston-area Jewish community or to Boston-area educational institutions where young Jews often first hook up with vast corrupt Jewish social networks.

    Not only do the roots of the Jewish Zionist conspiracy against Islamic finance and charities lead back to the Boston area in the persons of Daniel Pipes, Matthew Levitt, and Stuart Levey, but the Israel Lobby and associated Jewish Zionist transnational foreign policy conspiracy are strongly rooted in the region's educational institutions
    • like Tufts where Jeffrey David Feltman seems to have been recruited as an Eliot Abrams wannabe by means of the one Jewish grandparent argument and
    • like Harvard where the Harvard Wexner Israel fellowship tries to build subversive networks of trust between very often Jewish US public servants and almost invariably Jewish Israel government officials.
    In addition to generating pilpul about Islamic finance and charities in order to put a lot of good and decent people in jail for the sake of Zionism, Pipes led a criminal conspiracy against rights by attacking Debby Almontaser in order to destroy the Khalil Gibran International Academy of New York City while the DP and other Jews connected with the Boston-area academic community were heavily involved in a concerted effort
    • that was meant to prevent Nadia Abu el-Haj and Joseph Massad from receiving tenure from Columbia University and
    • that also amounted to conspiracy against rights.
    No one should be surprised that the US Senator from Israel Joseph Lieberman has a strong Boston Jewish connection because he and the exceptionally maniacal incompetent Zionist Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse are mehutanim (co-in-laws).

    Understanding the centrality of Boston Jewish power in the USA requires a critical look at The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. Professor Mearsheimer and Walt incorrectly claim that the Israel Lobby is just another lobby even though in reality the Israel Lobby is the public face of the Zionist Virtual Colonial Motherland or Judonia, which has rendered the USA a dependent and intimidated client state within the Zionist imperial system.

    Because the real or hard power of the USA is so vast while Judonia's is for the most part only apparent or soft, Judonia requires a pervasive web
    • that reaches into American society well beyond finance and foreign policy and
    • that keeps the vast majority of Americans either confused, intimidated, or ignorant.
    There may be other ways to construct the web, but using the resources that the Boston-area affords as a major American and world education center is probably the most efficient and provides an excellent means for the Boston Jewish power elite to spread its tentacles throughout the USA and the world.

    Because now and historically Jewish elites have long been totally unethical whether in dealings with Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, Ukrainian collective farmers, German butchers, or Polish peasants and generally in dealings with proste yidn (ordinary Jews), they and the Boston Jewish power elite in particular would certainly have no reluctance whatsoever about using the web constructed to control US foreign policy with regard to Israel for purposes outside of the "original specification," and the US Attorney investigations of Diane Wilkerson and Chuck Turner may be examples of such "out of spec" flexing of Jewish muscle.

    Note: Thomas Finneran as Exception That Proves the Rule

    Even though the closeness of former Massachusetts Speaker of the House Thomas Finneran to the Boston Jewish Zionist elite appeared to confer no special immunity when he was indicted in 2005 for obstruction of justice and perjury during a civil case related to Massachusetts redistricting, in reality, judges and prosecutors have very little tolerance for lying under oath, and it is extremely unusual for them to give a perjurer a pass on jail time even for a first offense. Not only did someone or some group come through for Finneran, but he also received a job as a talk radio host even though the much more articulate, erudite and well-known Billy Bulger would seem like a much better candidate for such a position.

    Chuck Turner's Email

    Dear Supporters,

    This Thursday, July 2nd, at noon in Courtroom 1 in the Moakley Courthouse Judge Woodlock has agreed to hear my lawyers' challenge to court approved gag order and attempt by the US Attorney's office to strip me of my first amendment rights. Let me briefly review the background of this hearing:

    a) In December 2008, Asst U.S. Attorney McNeil told my lawyers that if I would sign a gag order stating that I would not talk publicly about the discovery information (evidence of my guilt), they would give memore information than I would get if I wouldn't sign. They also said that I would get the information more quickly than I would if I refused to sign the gag order.

    As you can imagine, I said No. Why should I have to sign a gag order in order to get the "alleged evidence". I felt I had a right to the evidence and it would be ridiculous for me to give up my first amendment rights in order to get it. It was hard for me to imagine that after they had spread the "alleged pictures of my guilt" around the world before I was even arraigned, they would have the nerve to ask me to cooperate with them by silencing myself. However, as I am learning Asst US Attorney McNeil has no shame.

    When I wouldn't sign, McNeil went to court on January 5, 2009 and asked the court to require that I sign the gag order in order to receive the discovery. While the Judge approved the request on March 16th, I continued to refuse to sign. While my lawyers continually stress that I am making it more difficult for them if I don't enable them to see the evidence before the trial starts, my position is:

    1) That to cooperate with them by giving up my right of free speech would betray my people's 400 year struggle to have rights that are respected in this country.

    2) They don't have any evidence to convict me since I am not guilty and if they have made up some, I believe we can expose them.

    3) Since US Attorney Sullivan's objective was to silence me by any means, it would be crazy for me to cooperate with his objective.

    4) Since I am running for office, people will want me to talk about the legal situation I am in. I can't afford to say wait for the trial. They expect me to be candid and have a right to expect me to speak to the issue of the case, not hide behind my lawyers.

    5) While I certainly don't want to go to jail, some one has to stand up and challenge the flagrant abuse of power that takes place in many of the courts of this country every day. If I wind up being the poster child for racial injustice in this "post racial era", so be it.

    When McNeil found out that I would not sign the gag order, he went back to court and asked the judge to order me to take the information and the judge complied. However, I told my lawyer that if McNeil sent the "discovery" he should send it back unopened. While I thought that would end McNeil's feverish attempt to force my silence, he went back to court yet again in May. This time McNeil asked the Judge to take away all my legal rights regarding discovery information by ordering that if I didn't take the discovery now, I would lose any right to request motions or continuances on the basis of the discovery when finally received. Again, McNeil can huff and puff all that he wants but I am not going to put myself in his trap.

    As you can see from the above, McNeil is so determined to silence me, he has exposed the fact that this trial has nothing to do with justice. It's really about the deal that Sullivan made with Bush, Cheney, and Ashcroft. What do I mean by that? I personally believe that former Attorney General Ashcroft said to Sullivan that if he could take down Senator Wilkerson and myself, he would put up the money to open the firm of Ashcroft and Sullivan in Boston where they could try to secure business for Halliburton to serve as a base while Sullivan prepares for his run for Governor. Ashcroft seems to have made similar deals with three other US Attorneys in other parts of the country. In other words the quid pro quo for taking us down was the money to open the office.

    Hope you can join me on Thursday, July 2nd at noon in Court Room 1 of the Moakley Courthouse. I think it is not only going to be fascinating, I think it will also be fun. See you there.

    chuck
    Sphere: Related Content

    Thursday, July 02, 2009

    Samuel Gruber's Jewish Art & Monuments: Conference: Life and Work of the Maharal of Prague

    While the Maharal of Prague is worth an academic gathering
    • because he was an important Jewish religious scholar interested in subjects beyond Jewish scripture and
    • because he has semi-legendary status as the creator of a very powerful golem,
    the Israeli government is probably more interested in using the conference described below as a sneaky means to credential a criminal settler group as a legitimate university.

    Conference: Life and Work of the Maharal of Prague

    (ISJM) The Jewish Community of Prague will host a conference dedicated to the life and work of the great thinker and rabbi, the Maharal of Prague (Judah Lowe Ben Bezalel) from September 7-9, 2009 to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the death of the learned and legendary Rabbi and community leader.
    The conference seeks to bring about a full discussion on such topics as the Prague Maharal’s role in the life of Ashkenazi Jewry at the beginning of the modern era, his position in the Jewish religious philosophy of his period, and the importance of his spiritual legacy to modern Jewish philosophy and life. This special event will be attended by internationally renowned experts across the rabbinic and academic world. The official languages of the conference will be English and Hebrew.

    The following events will be held as part of the conference:
    • Group visit to the Maharal’s grave
    • Ceremonial opening of the conference
    • Gala reception at an historical venue
    • Visit to the exhibition on the Prague Maharal
    • Visit to the Jewish Museum in Prague
    The event is being organized in cooperation with the Department of Religious Affairs in the Diaspora (the Sochnut) and other institutions, including the Ariel University Center of Samaria, Charles University in Prague, the Federation of Jewish Communities in the Czech Republic and the Jewish Museum in Prague.

    For more information please visit the website at: www.maharal.name

    Sphere: Related Content

    Revolutionary Period Boston "Islamic" Garb

    Here is a local Boston historical re-enacter beside the grave of Samuel Adams.
    She looks ready to visit the Roxbury Mosque, doesn't she?

    When Jewish Zionist racists, French President Sarkozy or Dutch Parliamentarian Geer Wilders babble incoherently about Muslim dress but ignore traditional ethnic Ashkenazi or Arab Jewish garb (see also Rana and the Hijab), one has to assume that such theatrical scorn serves the coordinated effort to distract from Zionist crimes.
    Sphere: Related Content

    Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    ei: Argentina case threatens to criminalize criticism of Israel

    When I read reports like the one from Argentina below, I look for the background involvement of the American Jewish Committee (AJCom), which in many ways serves as the foreign office for the organized Jewish community or the Zionist Virtual Colonial Motherland (ZVCM). Names that provide a tip-off are Amanda Farfel, Stephanie Guiloff, Dina Siegel Vann, and a few others.

    The US State Department should be jealous of the ability of the AJCom
    • to get the laws legislated in foreign countries,
    • to manipulate national or international legal systems, and
    • to put its own operatives like US Treasury Department official Stuart Levey into governments of states that the ZVCM wants to dominate.
    The AJCom succees where the US State Department fails because the AJCom engages in transnational politics whereas foreign service officials practice international politics. The AJCom uses local Jewish communities and social networks to influence the media, to control education at every level, and to manipulate the local economy in ways that the US State Department would not dare. No grammar school textbook is to insignificant No interfaith meeting is too unimportant.

    Throughout N.A. and Europe Jewish Zionist interpretations of laws against hate speech rule, which almost invariably includes frank discussions of Zionism or of the context of the mass murders of Jews during WW2.

    Argentina has long been a focus of Jewish transnational politics (and crime -- Sholem Aleichem wrote about Jewish white slaver organizations in that country), and the transnational organized Jewish community seems to be succeeding in making anti-Zionist expression illegal.

    Argentina case threatens to criminalize criticism of Israel
    Hugh Harkin, The Electronic Intifada, 24 June 2009

    The detention of pro-Palestinian activists is protested in Buenos Aires, 26 May 2009. (Convergencia de Izquierda/argentina.indymedia.org)

    In what Nobel Peace laureate Adolfo Perez Esquivel has termed "a witch hunt and an attack on democratic freedoms," nine pro-Palestinian protesters in Argentina have been detained following a demonstration at an event celebrating Israel's 61st anniversary. The activists have been vilified as violent anti-Semites by politicians and the television and print media, and now face up to 12 years in prison for "ideological arrogance," under revived Juan Peron-era anti-terrorism legislation of dubious constitutionality.

    The furor erupted on 17 May 2009 when violence broke out between protesters and supporters of Israel at a city center event organized by the City of Buenos Aires to mark Israel's 61st anniversary, resulting in the arrest and detention of the protesters. The Israeli ambassador and the country's major Jewish organizations immediately denounced the incident as an "anti-Semitic attack," an interpretation repeated with little reflection, amid much sensationalism, by almost all of the media in Argentina.

    At least four ministers, and politicians of all stripes, rushed out to condemn the protesters. The lower house of parliament unanimously passed a resolution expressing their worry at these "serious attacks against the Argentinean Jewish community." With strong condemnations from the US ambassador and much talk of a "new outbreak of anti-Semitism," the five protesters originally arrested were refused bail. Four days later authorities raided the headquarters of the Teresa Rodriguez Movement (MTR), one of the groups involved in the protests, and seven others were taken into custody (three of these have since been released).

    What actually happened at the 17 May event, however, remains unclear. According to the witnesses who say they were attacked, the protesters arrived to the scene wielding sticks and chains, striking out indiscriminately at women, children and old people. According to their lawyer, the defendants claim that the violence broke out as soon as they arrived, but say that they only carried flyers, placards and a banner, and that it was in fact they who were set upon by a group of men who broke from the crowd.

    [To read the entire article, click here.]

    Sphere: Related Content