Help Fight Judonia!

Please help sustain EAAZI in the battle against Jewish Zionist transnational political economic manipulation and corruption.

For more info click here or here!

Friday, March 14, 2008

Israel-Incited "Genocide" in Darfur?

Zionist leaders and ideologues have long expressed the hope and worked for the dissolution of Arab and Muslim countries into impotent ministates. During the reign of the Shah, the State of Israel assisted Kurdish separatists in Iraq.
 
Ismail Kushkush' report below does not address how long the State of Israel has been working with "rebels" in Darfur, but fomenting or exacerbating an existing Darfurian insurgency to complement a longstanding strategy to break up Sudan by inciting civil war between the North and the South is completely consistent with Zionist subversion throughout the Middle East.
 
The combination of manipulation of US foreign policy
  • to orchestrate war against Iraq, 
  • to undermine any possibility of stability in Somalia, ,
  • to incite war against Iran, and
  • to support Israel against Hezbollah
has the appearance of a unified anti-Arab anti-Muslim strategy.

Internal US components  of the program appear to include
in order to neutralize potential critics of the effort to create popular support for direct American military intervention or invasion of the Sudan to save Darfur from an alleged genocide that is really Zionist-inspired violence. (See Monsters: Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power.)
 
In the last stage of the program American Friedmanites would bring free-market privatization to occupied Sudan to loot the country of its resources.
 

 
Image

"This shows that the movement has no popular base," Shaarani told IOL.

KHARTOUM — The decision by the rebel Sudanese Liberation Movement (SLM) faction of Abd al-Wahid Nur to open a liaison office in Israel has infuriated most Sudanese, including Darfurians.

"This will created more divisions in Darfur," Salah al-Fadul Rijal, the current sultan-general of the Fur tribes, told IslamOnline.net over the phone from Nyala, Darfur.

"Some tribes are now calling for a jihad against the SLM because they believe that they are a front for Israel in Darfur. Even some associated with the SLM are denouncing this act."

Nur, himself a member of the Fur ethnic group, has announced opening a liaison office in Tel Aviv to help Darfurians who have sought refuge in Israel.

Darfur in Focus
He praised Israel for "for protecting Darfur youth from genocide" and insisted that his rebellion will change norms and break taboos in Sudan, especially about Israel.  

"Our vision of Sudan as we see it would allow for the opening of an Israeli embassy in Khartoum as long as it is in line with the interests of the Sudanese people," Nur told Sudan Tribune from his Paris residence.

Sudan, which does not have diplomatic relations with Israel over its occupation of Arab lands, described Nur's decision as evidence that the Darfur crisis has been manipulated by foreign hands.

Nur's SLM is one a few rebel groups that has refused to subscribe to the 2006 Abuja peace agreement. It has refused to date to participate in peace negotiations.

The Darfur conflict erupted in February 2003 after rebel groups attacked government targets, accusing Khartoum of neglect and discrimination.

Thousands have died because of fighting, drought and desperate humanitarian conditions but there are no accurate account with figure ranging from the government's 9,000 to the UN's 200,000.

Infuriated

Several Darfurian and Sudanese political parties, civil society and student groups have condemned Nur's decision.

Mahmud Shaarani, a human rights lawyer and head of the Sudanese Center for Comparative Human Rights Studies, one of the first groups to bring the Darfur conflict to attention, has described Nur's move as "non-sensical."

"This shows that the movement [the SLM-Nur faction] has no popular base," he told IOL.

"Darfur is the most 'Islamic' province in Sudan: to contact Israel shows that they don't care for Darfur."

Sayed El-Khatib, the director of the Center for Strategic Studies in Khartoum, was shock by the SLM move.

"Even if people are divided on other issues, this is one issue where people have utterly rejected Israel because of its occupation of Arab lands."

The Darfur Organizations Network, a local network of humanitarian NGOs, has condemned Nur's decision "especially when Israel is currently involved in crimes against the Palestinian people."

A week-long Israeli onslaught has claimed the lives of more than 129 people, including more than 40 children, toddlers and newborn babies, as well as 13 women.

More than 400 Palestinians have also been injured in the Israeli air and ground blitz.

Affecting Talks

"The international community needs to bring people who really represent Darfur," El-Khatib told IOL.

Some predict that Nur's decision may affect attempts by the international community to unite the negotiating platform of the nineteen Darfurian rebel groups on the one hand and peace talks with the Sudanese government on the other.

"This will delay the attempts to unite these groups and open the door for foreign intervention," says Shaarani, the human rights lawyer.

Abdalla Adam Khatir, a Darfurian writer, disagrees.

He believes that this was an act out of "despair" on behalf of Nur who has not carefully calculated the political ramifications of his decision.

Khatir rules out any impact on the Darfur negotiations.

"This is a side effect of the crisis. The international community is working together to put a road map for peace in Darfur."

El-Khatib, the director of the Center for Strategic Studies in Khartoum, believes that Nur's action, on the contrary, will help speed up negotiations.

"People are going to see the real face of some the rebel leaders; that they have personal agendas. The international community needs to bring people who really represent Darfur."


Sphere: Related Content

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

dafur is an internal african problem. the west has interfered, and continues to do so. israel has little or nothing to do with dafur. the writer seems to know little about dafur, and sudan in particular. he would do well to talk to the eritrean rep in his area and find out what is really going on for the saying in the horn is all roads to peace in the horn run through asmara...

writing as someone who has sat next to most of the dafur leadership at one time or another here in the ambossoira hotel in asmara next thing we will be hearing about israeli military bases in the dahlak islands... from asmara, eritrea, selam and rain for the horn,

thomas c mountain

ps. keep pulbishing ignorance like this article and i will remove myself from your list

Joachim Martillo said...

If I am not mistaken Ismail Kushkush is Sudanese and spends a good part of the year in Sudan.

The London Jewish Chronicle covered the opening of the SLM office in Darfur faction opens office in Israel.

The Kushkush article elaborates the story with quoted opinions from various Sudanese.

As a news report, it seems perfectly acceptable.

Zionists have been discussing changes of the map of the ME since the beginning of the movement.

Zionist strategy for dividing the Arab East analyzes a rather recent paper published in 1982 and embodying such ideas, but Zionist proposals to this effect go back to the nineteenth century when the leadership realized that the Ottoman Empire would be an obstacle, and even before Zionism Russian Jews were influenced by ideas of remaking the Islamic world through the writings of Nikolai Chernyshevski.

I have read intelligence reports of Chad, Sudan and the Horn of Africa that put Israeli agents in Chad and Darfur in the late 50s and early 60s when France and Israel had a de facto alliance. During the North South Sudanese civil war there were reliable reports that Israelis were training Southerners and that Israeli or American Zionist organizations were supplying money and weapons.

Omer Ismail has met with Zionist groups in Boston that could directly or indirectly supply such resources in Darfur while Boston area Zionists highly influential with the Israeli government have been talking since the early 1990s about dismantling the Sudan for access to its resources and in order to eliminate a state that is uncompromising in its hostility to Israel.

Anonymous said...

Hope you are well. Yes, I am Sudanese-American, and I've been reporting from Sudan for a year now. Excuse my late reply, I was actually on a quick trip to Darfur and the Northern Province.

On the last report, I will add this. The overwhelming majority of Sudanese, even Darfurians of various political and ethnic belongings, have condemned Nur's act. Even the SLM-Minnawi faction (signers to the DPA-the Abuja agreement) has distanced itself from it. Shaarani (the human rights lawyer who I interviewed first in the article) is politically in opposition to the government. He actually surprised me with his answers.

As I see it, the Eritrean rep in Khartoum would have nothing to do with the topic of this report to be interviewed in the first place, unless your friend would like to specify how so.

On Israel's involvement in Sudanese affairs, there have reports on this, but the most serious one has to be a recent memoir by former Ana Nya leader Joseph Lago, whose Southern Sudanese group fought the central govt. till the 1972 Addis Abba Agreement. In it he discusses the relationship Ana Nya had with Israel, which is believed to have had spilled over the to SPLA in the 80s and 90s. Kenyan prof. Ali Mazrui has written on this as well.

As far as Darfur, I speculate that any ties are likely via American and European Jewish groups who have been active on Darfur.

More can be said, but I will leave it there.

Best,
Isma'il

Anonymous said...

there is no genocide in dafur, using the word in relation to dafur is little more than an open call for western invasion of the area. the organized fighting in dafur ended in late 2004, according to the leadership of the dafur resistance that was here in asmara last year for their unity conference. apparently mr. kashkash has not been in touch with them or even talked to the eritreans, whom have overseen the entire sudan peace talks. i doubt he knows the role the eritreans played in 2002 in forcing bashir to the peace table when they fought along side the eastern sudan fighters in cutting the khartoum-port sudan highway for two weeks...

to return to the use of the word genocide in dafur, this word is accurate in describing the situation in somalia and ogaden and other parts of ethiopia. using it in dafur supports the efforts of the zionist controlled save dafur hype and adds to the call for western invasion of dafur, something i think mr. kashkash is in favor of.

sudan has seen many fly by night journalists who claim some sort of knowledge of what is going on, and i have had my share of discussions with more than a few. none have any real idea of what is going on in sudan in general, maybe a recent background on what is going on in west sudan but the real deal? no way and mr. kashkash use of the word genocide is very indicative of his stance on the subject, as for israels involvement in sudan, a non story.

eritrea has normal relations with israel, does this make eritrea counterevolutionary? just as the usa likes to claim, without any proof, that eritrea is supplying arms to dafur fighters, various people and organizations like to say that israel is involved in dafur, what a joke!

if mr kashkash has any real proof of genocide or israels involvement in dafur, other than supporting western invasion as mr kashkash does, than provide it, for no one in the dafur leadership has made any such claim and other than some very shaky claims you sent me there is none.

the west is the main problem now in both dafur and chad, and has effectively destroyed the peace movement in chad and doing their best to destroy the peace deals that have been implemented in dafur and mr kashkash fails completely to cover this story, instead using dangerous words that only support the calls for invasion. next mr kashkash will be repeating the wildly inflated claims that 200,000 no 400,000 were killed in dafur? ask him and see for yourself....

beware sudanese americans who claim expertise on dafur, there are more than a few on the zionist payroll callling for western invasion of dafur from the center of the peace movement in the horn,

thomas c mountain
in asmara,
selam and rain for the horn of africa

Joachim Martillo said...

Dear Thomas,

Ismail KushKush' article only mentioned the term genocide in a quotation from Nur. I used the word once enclosed by quotation marks and once preceded by the attribute "alleged." Nothing that Ismail has sent me indicates he considers genocide a proper description of the situation in Darfur while I question the motives of those using "genocide terminology" in describing conditions in Darfur.

Do you deny that Israel has alternately mixed in Lebanese politics and attacked Lebanon?

Do you deny the involvement of Israel in the US attack on Iraq?

The Israeli government is frankly interested in Sudan's resources, and the opening of an SLM office more or less speaks for itself.

In any case, Ismail was not claiming there was a genocide. He was reporting interviewee statements.

He was reporting statistics from the Sudanese government and from the UN. Because he was writing a news report, he withheld any personal judgment.

As far as I know, Ismail is opposed to a Western invasion, but I should not be able to determine his opinion from a correctly written news report.

Best,

Joachim Martillo

Anonymous said...

Hi Joachim

Thanks for the comments. I simply found it unworthy to reply such accusations. "On the Zionist pay roll? support an invasion of Sudan? ridiculous! I can count on one hand the inviduals and groups in the US who have worked on Sudan against the general narative of genocide, slavery, etc...

I don't know if you know mr. Thomas, but he appears as someone who still thinks that the EPLF is a "revolutionary" organization-a characteristic they lost over ten years ago when they became one of Africa's (according to Bill Clinton) "new princes" or "Africa's renaissance leaders", like many former "revolutionary" ,now neo-liberal, third world groups. Relations with Israel not counter-revolutionary? then what is?

This article was about Sudanese reactions to the SLM's move; not about Israeli involvement in Darfur. The article can surely can be taken as an element in understanding this involvement, but that needs a greater investigation-and I suspect there is. it was a news report,not an op-ed or feature.

isma'il

RandallJones said...

Here is additional information about Israeli and U.S. role in fueling the violence in Darfur.
http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=447&Itemid=1

Here is an article of Israel and the Congo
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_keith_ha_080207_the_gertler_steinmet.htm

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated.