Posts
since Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:04:17.
The ACLU document entitled “Blocking Faith, Freezing Charity: Chilling Muslim Charitable Giving in the ‘War on Terrorism Financing.’” should have used some number of its 166 pages to identify culprits. The authors failed to discuss the concerted and conspiratorial effort orchestrated by Israel advocates to delegitimize Islamic finance and charity.
The text included no discussion relating to the association of mainstream Jewish communal institutions, of Israel Advocacy groups, or of Zionist think tanks with asset seizures and with false prosecutions. Because many of these organizations almost certainly broke the rules related to maintaining 501(c)(3) status and because the IRS has failed to address such flagrant violations, there is yet another layer of civil and criminal violations that the ACLU report does not devote even one word to address.
The text included no discussion relating to the association of mainstream Jewish communal institutions, of Israel Advocacy groups, or of Zionist think tanks with asset seizures and with false prosecutions. Because many of these organizations almost certainly broke the rules related to maintaining 501(c)(3) status and because the IRS has failed to address such flagrant violations, there is yet another layer of civil and criminal violations that the ACLU report does not devote even one word to address.
The refusal to designate the IDF a terrorist organization even in the aftermath of the Gaza Rampage indicates possible Fourteenth Amendment violations that the ACLU report completely ignored and that imply possible obstruction of justice by federal officials engaged in criminal conspiracy with Jewish and Zionist groups outside of government.
Remedies should have included the immediate dismissal of Stuart Levey from the Treasury Department and opening of investigations into US Code violations related to seditious conspiracy and conspiracy against rights. The attack on Islamic charity required the coordinated efforts of an immense number of people in government, in the media, in academia and among the think-tank experts. If there were ever a case where the RICO Act should be applied, this one is it. In addition, the ACLU report proposed no relief for those already imprisoned either after intimidation into guilty pleas or after unfair trial proceedings.
Overall the ACLU's analysis was so disappointing that one must wonder whether the authors might have been engaged in some sort of coverup themselves.
Sphere: Related Content
